Abstract
Previous studies have reported that religious words and religiosity affect mental processes and behaviors. However, it is unclear what psycholinguistic features of religious words (e.g., familiarity, imageability, and emotional aspects) are associated with each dimension of personal religiosity (intellect, ideology, public practice, private practice, and experience). The purpose of this study was to examine whether and how the above-mentioned psycholinguistic features of religious words correlate with each of the core dimensions of religiosity. Japanese participants evaluated four psycholinguistic features of twelve religious words using a 5-point Semantic Differential scale for familiarity and imageability and a 9-point Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) scale for emotional valence and emotional arousal. The participants also rated their own religiosity using the Japanese version of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale (JCRS). The results of the study revealed that (1) the scales measuring the psycholinguistic features of religious words were statistically reliable; (2) the JCRS was reliable; (3) the familiarity, emotional valence, and emotional arousal of religious words and each mean dimensional score of the JCRS score correlated positively with each other; and (4) highly religious people had higher familiarity and higher emotional arousal to religious words than non-religious people, whereas highly religious people had higher emotional valence to religious words in comparison with non-religious and religious people. In addition, religious people had higher familiarity to religious words than non-religious people. Taken together, these findings suggest that psycholinguistic features of religious words contribute to the detection of religiosity.
Reference56 articles.
1. Validation of the Short Forms of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale in Georgia
2. Validation of the Short Forms of Centrality of Religiosity Scale in Russia
3. The relations of gratitude to religiosity, well-being, and personality;Aghababaei;Mental Health, Religion & Culture,2018
4. Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words;Altarriba;Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,1999
5. Dates of entry and measures of imagery, concreteness, goodness, and familiarity for 1046 words sampled from the Oxford English Dictionary;Benjafield;Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,1989
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献