Prognostic Trends and Current Challenges in Candidemia: A Comparative Analysis of Two Multicenter Cohorts within the Past Decade

Author:

Agnelli Caroline1ORCID,Guimarães Thaís2ORCID,Sukiennik Teresa3,Lima Paulo Roberto Passos1,Salles Mauro José4,Breda Giovanni Luís5,Queiroz-Telles Flavio5ORCID,Chaves Magri Marcello Mihailenko6,Mendes Ana Verena7,Camargo Luís Fernando Aranha8,Morales Hugo9,de Carvalho Hessel Dias Viviane Maria10,Rossi Flávia11,Colombo Arnaldo Lopes1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo 04024-002, Brazil

2. Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, São Paulo 04039-000, Brazil

3. Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 90050-170, Brazil

4. Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo 01221-010, Brazil

5. Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba; 81531-990, Brazil

6. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina USP (FMUSP), São Paulo 05403-010, Brazil

7. Hospital São Rafael, Salvador 41253-190, Brazil

8. Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05652-900, Brazil

9. Hospital Erasto Gaertner, São Paulo 81520-060, Brazil

10. Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Curitiba 80810-040, Brazil

11. Pathology Department, Laboratório de Microbiologia da Divisão de Laboratório Central, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina USP (FMUSP), São Paulo 05403-010, Brazil

Abstract

Candidemia remains a major public health challenge due to its high mortality rates, especially in developing countries. Monitoring epidemiological trends may provide insights for better clinical outcomes. This study aimed to describe trends in the epidemiology, therapeutic practices, and mortality in candidemia through a retrospective comparative analysis between two surveillance cohorts of all candidemic adults at eleven tertiary hospitals in Brazil, from 2010–2011 (Period I) versus 2017–2018 (Period II). A total of 616 cases were diagnosed, with 247 being from Period II. These patients were more likely to have three or more coexisting comorbidities [72 (29.1%) vs. 60 (16.3%), p < 0.001], had a prior history of in-hospital admissions more often [102 (40.3%) vs. 79 (21.4%), p = 0.001], and presented with candidemia earlier after admission, within 15 days (0–328) vs. 19 (0–188), p = 0.01. Echinocandins were more frequently prescribed [102 (41.3%) vs. 50 (13.6%), p = 0.001], but time to antifungal initiation [2 days (0–14) vs. 2 (0–13), p = 0.369] and CVC removal within 48 h [90/185 (48.6%) vs. 148/319 (46.4%), p = 0.644] remained unchanged. Additionally, many patients went untreated in both periods I and II [87 (23.6%) vs. 43 (17.4%), p = 0.07], respectively. Unfortunately, no improvements in mortality rates at 14 days [123 (33.6%) vs. 93 (37.7%), p = 0.343] or at 30 days [188 (51.4%) vs. 120 (48.6%), p = 0.511] were observed. In conclusion, mortality rates remain exceedingly high despite therapeutic advances, probably associated with an increase in patients’ complexity and suboptimal therapeutic interventions. Management strategies should be tailored to suit epidemiological changes, expedite diagnosis to reduce the number of untreated eligible patients and guarantee early antifungal initiation and source control.

Funder

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

CAPES Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Plant Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Microbiology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3