Potentials and Challenges of Chatbot-Supported Thesis Writing: An Autoethnography
-
Published:2023-11-28
Issue:4
Volume:2
Page:611-635
-
ISSN:2813-4346
-
Container-title:Trends in Higher Education
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Trends in Higher Education
Author:
Schwenke Nicolas1ORCID, Söbke Heinrich1ORCID, Kraft Eckhard1
Affiliation:
1. Bauhaus-Institute for Infrastructure Solutions, Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, 99423 Weimar, Germany
Abstract
The release of the large language model-based chatbot ChatGPT 3.5 in November 2022 has brought considerable attention to the subject of artificial intelligence, not only to the public. From the perspective of higher education, ChatGPT challenges various learning and assessment formats as it significantly reduces the effectiveness of their learning and assessment functionalities. In particular, ChatGPT might be applied to formats that require learners to generate text, such as bachelor theses or student research papers. Accordingly, the research question arises to what extent writing of bachelor theses is still a valid learning and assessment format. Correspondingly, in this exploratory study, the first author was asked to write his bachelor’s thesis exploiting ChatGPT. For tracing the impact of ChatGPT methodically, an autoethnographic approach was used. First, all considerations on the potential use of ChatGPT were documented in logs, and second, all ChatGPT chats were logged. Both logs and chat histories were analyzed and are presented along with the recommendations for students regarding the use of ChatGPT suggested by a common framework. In conclusion, ChatGPT is beneficial for thesis writing during various activities, such as brainstorming, structuring, and text revision. However, there are limitations that arise, e.g., in referencing. Thus, ChatGPT requires continuous validation of the outcomes generated and thus fosters learning. Currently, ChatGPT is valued as a beneficial tool in thesis writing. However, writing a conclusive thesis still requires the learner’s meaningful engagement. Accordingly, writing a thesis is still a valid learning and assessment format. With further releases of ChatGPT, an increase in capabilities is to be expected, and the research question needs to be reevaluated from time to time.
Reference66 articles.
1. Schmoll, T., Löffel, J., and Falkemeier, G. (2019). Lehrexperimente der Hochschulbildung. Didaktische Innovationen aus den Fachdisziplinen, wbv. no. 2, vollständig überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. 2. Alexander, B., Ashford-Rowe, K., Barajas-Murph, N., Dobbin, G., Knott, J., McCormack, M., Pomerantz, J., Seilhamer, R., and Weber, N. (2019). EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: 2019 Higher Education Edition, Educause. Available online: https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2019/4/2019horizonreport.pdf. 3. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators?;Bond;Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ.,2019 4. de Witt, C., and Rampelt, F. (2020). Künstliche Intelligenz in der Hochschulbildung Whitepaper, KI-Campus. 5. Gao, C.A., Howard, F.M., Markov, N.S., Dyer, E.C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., and Pearson, A.T. (Sci. Commun. Educ., 2022). Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers, Sci. Commun. Educ., preprint.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|