Affiliation:
1. Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117596, Singapore
Abstract
Once retracted, the citation count of a research paper might be intuitively expected to drop precipitously. Here, we assessed the post-retraction citation of life and medical sciences papers from two top-ranked, multidisciplinary journals Nature and Science, from 2010 to 2018. Post-retraction citations accounted for a staggering 47.7% and 40.9% of total citations (median values), respectively, of the papers included in our analysis. These numbers are comparable with those from two journals with lower impact factors, and with retracted papers from the physical sciences discipline. A more qualitative assessment of five papers from the two journals with a high percentage (>50%) of post-retraction citations, all of which are associated with misconduct, reveal different contributing reasons and factors. Retracted papers associated with highly publicized misconduct cases are more prone to being cited with the retraction status indicated, or projected negatively (such as in the context of research ethics and misconduct discussions), with the latter also indicated by cross-disciplinary citations by humanities and social sciences articles. Retracted papers that retained significant validity in their main findings/conclusions may receive a large number of neutral citations that are somewhat blind to the retraction. Retracted papers in popular subject areas with massive publication outputs, particularly secondary publications such as reviews, may also have a high background citation noise. Our findings add further insights to the nature of post-retraction citations beyond the plain notion that these are largely made through sheer ignorance or negligence by the citing authors.
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Media Technology,Communication,Business and International Management,Library and Information Sciences
Reference57 articles.
1. What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing’s ‘death penalty’;Brainard;Science,2018
2. The Center for Scientific Integrity (2023, May 01). The Retraction Watch Database [Internet]. The Center for Scientific Integrity, March 2023. Available online: http://retractiondatabase.org/RetractionSearch.aspx?.
3. A comprehensive analysis of articles retracted between 2004 and 2013 from biomedical literature—A call for reforms;Singh;J. Tradit. Complement. Med.,2014
4. Yeo-Teh, N.S., and Tang, B.L. (2022). Sustained Rise in Retractions in the Life Sciences Literature during the Pandemic Years 2020 and 2021. Publications, 10.
5. 1500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility;Baker;Nature,2016