The Effectiveness of Educational Interventions in Improving Waste Management Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
-
Published:2024-04-23
Issue:9
Volume:16
Page:3513
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Conti Alessio1ORCID, Viottini Elena12ORCID, Comoretto Rosanna Irene1ORCID, Piovan Chiara3, Martin Barbara1, Albanesi Beatrice1ORCID, Clari Marco1ORCID, Dimonte Valerio1ORCID, Campagna Sara1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy 2. Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy 3. Department of Orthopedics and Functional Rehabilitation, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
Abstract
The healthcare sector represents a major source of waste production, and healthcare workers (HCWs) are crucial in waste management. Educational interventions (EIs) can be delivered through a single component (mono-component) or by combining different components (multi-component); although they have a potential impact on the sustainability of healthcare, their effectiveness in waste management still needs to be identified. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to describe EIs to improve waste management knowledge, attitudes, and practices among HCWs and provide an estimate of their effectiveness. Six relevant databases were searched; 24 articles were included, and 19 were meta-analyzed. These were mainly from low-income countries and did not consider EIs for recycling, reducing, and reusing. Compared to the mono-component EIs, the multi-component Eis showed a higher statistically significant positive post-intervention effect on knowledge, with greater retention in the medium–long term, and on practices, particularly among non-hands-on HCWs. The effects of the EIs on attitudes were not significant. Our results suggest that multi-component EIs should be preferred to improve waste management standards in the healthcare sector. Given the heterogeneity found among EIs, the standardization of types, content, duration, and assessment methods should be considered. Finally, their harmonization at a global level could influence international and national policies on sustainability.
Reference85 articles.
1. Health Care without Harm (2019). Arup Health Care Climate Footprint Report—How the Health Sector Contributes to the Global Climate Crisis and Opportunities for Action, Health Care without Harm. 2. Lattanzio, S., Stefanizzi, P., D’ambrosio, M., Cuscianna, E., Riformato, G., Migliore, G., Tafuri, S., and Bianchi, F.P. (2022). Waste Management and the Perspective of a Green Hospital—A Systematic Narrative Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19. 3. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2024, February 06). Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/basel-convention-on-the-control-of-transboundary-movements-of-hazardous-wastes-and-their-disposal.html. 4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2008). EPA’s Report on the Environment (ROE) (2008 Final Report), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 5. World Health Organization (2014). Safe Management of Wastes from Health-Care Activities, World Health Organization. [2nd ed.].
|
|