Enhancing the Performance of Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Frequency Ratio and Gaussian Mixture Model

Author:

Huangfu Wenchao12,Qiu Haijun123ORCID,Wu Weicheng4ORCID,Qin Yaozu4ORCID,Zhou Xiaoting5,Zhang Yang6,Ullah Mohib1,He Yanfen1

Affiliation:

1. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China

2. Institute of Earth Surface System and Hazards, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China

3. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China

4. Key Laboratory of Digital Lands and Resources, Faculty of Earth Sciences, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China

5. School of Architectural Engineering, Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Nanchang 330013, China

6. State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

Abstract

A rational landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) can minimize the losses caused by landslides and enhance the efficiency of disaster prevention and reduction. At present, frequency ratio (FR), information value (IV), and certainty factor (CF) are widely used to quantify the relationships between landslides and their causative factors; however, it remains unclear which method is the most effective. Moreover, existing landslide susceptibility zoning methods lack full automation; thus, the results are full of uncertainties. To address this, the FR, IV, and CF were used to analyze the relationship between landslides and causative factors. Subsequently, three distinct sets of models were developed, namely random forest models (RF_FR, RF_IV, and RF_CF), support vector machine models (SVM_FR, SVM_IV, and SVM_CF), and logistic regression models (LR_FR, LR_IV, and LR_CF) using the analysis results as inputs. A Gaussian mixture model (GMM) was introduced as a new method for landslide susceptibility zoning, classifying the LSM into five distinct levels. An accuracy evaluation of the models and a rationality analysis of the LSM indicated that the FR is superior to the IV and CF in quantifying the relationship between landslides and causative factors. Additionally, the quantile method was employed as a comparative approach to the GMM, further validating the effectiveness of the GMM. This research contributes to more effective and efficient LSM, ultimately enhancing landslide prevention measures.

Funder

Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3