Author:
Staubli Noémie,Schmidt Julia C.,Rinne Carin A.,Signer-Buset Sabrina L.,Rodriguez Fabiola R.,Walter Clemens
Abstract
Animal experiments are a source of debate. This bibliometric study aims to identify published research in two representative dental journals: the Journal of Periodontology (JP) and the Journal of Clinical Periodontology (JCP). Two time points (1982/83 and 2012/13) covering 30 years were chosen. Articles describing data from animal experiments were identified and the data were extracted and compared between journals and time points. In 1982/83, 27 animal studies were published in JP and 17 in JCP. For 2012/13, 54 animal studies were considered in JP and 37 in JCP. The species examined were predominantly dogs (37%) in JCP and rats (61%) in JP in 1982/83. In 2012/13, rodents accounted for 85% in JP and for 54% in JCP. The number of animals used per study increased by a factor of 1.6–2.6. The diversity of geographic origin and articles from emerging countries increased over time. The number of animals examined per study and the publications describing these experiments seemed to have increased in the journals analyzed in the last decades.
Reference41 articles.
1. Brandanschlag auf Vasellas Tiroler Jagdsitzhttps://www.nzz.ch/vasella_brand_jagdsitz_tirol-1.3272074
2. Basel Declaration defends animal research
3. A Call for More Trust, Transparency and Communication on Animal Researchhttp://www.basel-declaration.org
4. Facts and Figures on Animal Testinghttps://www.crueltyfreeinternational.org/why-we-do-it/facts-and-figures-animal-testing
5. Permeability of the dento-gingival blood vessels.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献