Thermodynamic Analysis and Comparison of Power Cycles for Small Modular Reactors

Abstract

Small nuclear power plants can provide a stable, carbon-free energy supply to civil infrastructure and industrial enterprises in remote regions isolated from unified energy systems. More than 70 projects of small modular reactors are currently being developed by IAEA member countries; several low-power power units are already supplying thermal and electrical energy to consumers. One of the main limitations standing in the way of widespread dissemination of this technology is the high specific capital cost of a low-power nuclear power plant; therefore, new scientific and technical solutions are needed in this industry. Increasing the thermodynamic efficiency of power cycles of small modular reactors can become a driver for reducing the cost of supplied electrical energy. This paper presents the results of a comprehensive thermodynamic analysis of existing and promising power cycles for small modular reactors. In addition to traditional steam power cycles, cycles using non-traditional working fluids, including carbon dioxide, freons, and helium cycles, are considered. Optimal sets of thermodynamic parameters were determined to ensure maximum net efficiency of electricity production. For water-cooled reactor plants, a maximum efficiency of 33.5% at an initial temperature of 300 °C could be achieved using a steam turbine cycle. It was revealed that for reactor plants with liquid metal and liquid salt coolant in the range of initial temperatures above 550–700 °C, the maximum thermal efficiency was provided by the Brayton recompression cycle with a carbon dioxide coolant: the net electrical efficiency exceeded the level of steam turbine plants, with intermediate superheating of the steam, and could reach a value of 49.4% at 600 °C. This makes the use of these cycles promising for low-power nuclear power plants with a high initial temperature. In small gas-cooled reactor plants with a helium coolant, the use of a binary cycle consisting of a helium Brayton cycle and a steam-powered Rankine cycle provided an efficiency of 44.3% at an initial helium temperature of 700 °C and 52.9% at 1000 °C. This was higher than in the Brayton cycle with a recuperator, with a minimum temperature difference in the heat exchanger of 20 °C: the efficiency was 40.2% and 52%, respectively. Also, the transition to power cycles with non-traditional working fluids will lead to a change in the operating conditions of turbomachines and heat exchangers.