Affiliation:
1. State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-Arid Arable Land in Northern China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
2. Water Conservancy Engineering College, Fujian Coll Water Conservancy & Elect Power, Sanming 366000, China
3. State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Environment, Ministry of Agriculture/Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Abstract
Recently, there has been a significant focus on the issue of pollution caused by livestock and poultry rearing, which is recognized as a prominent contributor to nonpoint source pollution in the agricultural sector. This study employed the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology to evaluate the environmental impact of several pig manure processing scenarios with the aim of determining the appropriate solid–liquid separation tool for large-scale pig farms. The findings indicate that the utilization of a screw extruder for solid–liquid separation in Scenario 2 has a lower environmental impact. In contrast to Scenario 1, Scenario 2 exhibits reduced environmental potential in the areas of global warming, human toxicity, acidification, and eutrophication. Specifically, the global warming, human toxicity, acidification, and eutrophication impacts decreased by 56%, 81%, 83%, and 273%, respectively, due to the implementation of solid–liquid separation. The type of solid–liquid separation equipment used during the processing of swine manure, as well as the subsequent treatment, have a significant impact on environmental emissions. Compared to Scenario 2, Scenario 3, which utilizes a centrifugal microfilter for solid–liquid separation, exhibits a lower environmental impact in terms of human toxicity, resulting in a reduction of 0.736 kg DCB-eq. In general, solid–liquid separation is a viable and environmentally friendly method for the disposal of waste from large-scale pig farms. The adoption of this method is highly recommended. During its implementation, careful consideration should be given to factors such as separation efficiency and pollution emissions. It is crucial to select appropriate equipment for solid–liquid separation to effectively process the waste.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China (General Program) of China
Fundamental Research Funds for Central Non-profit Scientific institution of China
Subject
Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science,Food Science
Reference75 articles.
1. Decision-making behaviors and influence factors of pig farmers at different scales against African swine fever. Trans;Zhou;Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng.,2020
2. Discharge of swine wastes risks water quality and food safety: Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes from swine sources to the receiving environments;He;Environ. Int.,2016
3. Solid-liquid separation of animal slurry in theory and practice. A review;Hjorth;Agron. Sustain. Dev.,2010
4. Analysis of livestock and poultry manure pollution in China and its treatment and resource utilization;Wu;J. Agro-Environ. Sci.,2020
5. Analysis of Research Status and Development on Engineering Technology of Swine Farming Facilities;Wang;CSSCI,2018