Sustainable Production of Maize with Grass and Pigeon Pea Intercropping
-
Published:2023-06-14
Issue:6
Volume:13
Page:1246
-
ISSN:2077-0472
-
Container-title:Agriculture
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Agriculture
Author:
Fernandes Patrick Bezerra1ORCID, Gonçalves Lucas Ferreira1, Claudio Flavio Lopes2, Souza Janayna Almeida2, Júnior Guido Calgaro2, Alves Estenio Moreira2ORCID, Paim Tiago Do Prado12ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano Campus Rio Verde, Rodovia Sul Goiana, Km 01, Zona Rural, Rio Verde 75.901-970, GO, Brazil 2. Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano Campus Iporá, Avenida Oeste, n.350, Parque União, Iporá 76200-000, GO, Brazil
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the impact of intercropping pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan cv. Super N) with maize (Zea mays cv. AG 5055) and Paiaguás palisadegrass (Urochloa brizantha cv. BRS Paiaguás) on grain yield, silage chemical composition, and post-harvest grazing forage. The experiment was conducted on the School Farm of Instituto Federal Goiano, Campus Iporá. The experiment treatments consisted of three cropping systems: pigeon pea and Paiaguás palisadegrass intercropping (PPPG), maize and Paiaguás palisadegrass intercropping (CPG), and maize, pigeon pea, and Paiaguás palisadegrass intercropping (CPPPG), respectively. It was observed after the fermentation process that the PPPG silage promoted the lowest values of forage mass (FM) and a reduction in the dry matter (DM) concentration. The PPPG silage showed higher values of crude protein (75.28 g kg−1 DM), while the CPPPG silage showed proportionately higher values of total digestible nutrients (616.11 g kg−1 DM). The intercropping did not affect the corn grain productivity, thus obtaining an average value of 4.78 Mg ha-1. After the silage harvest, during the dry season, a similar forage availability was obtained between the treatments (3.73 Mg ha−1). All three cultivation strategies produced abundant forage for grazing, showing that integrated intercropping systems can mitigate the seasonality in tropical forage production.
Funder
National Council for Scientific and Technological Development Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior–Brasil Goiano Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology
Subject
Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science,Food Science
Reference64 articles.
1. Correia, J.R., Reatto, A., and Spera, S.T. (2004). Cerrado Correção do Solo e Adubação, EMBRAPA Cerrados. (In Portuguese). 2. Gao, L., Li, W., Ashraf, U., Lu, W., Li, Y., Li, C., Li, G., Li, G., and Hu, J. (2020). Nitrogen Fertilizer Management and Maize Straw Return Modulate Yield and Nitrogen Balance in Sweet Corn. Agronomy, 10. 3. Morphogenetic, structural and production traits of marandu grass under nitrogen rates in Neo soil;Costa;Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec.,2021 4. Growth dynamics and nutrient uptake of panicum maximum under nitrogen fertilisation;Almeida;New Zealand J. Agric. Res.,2022 5. Biological and economic responses to increasing nitrogen rates in Mombaça guinea grass pastures;Euclides;Sci. Rep.,2022
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|