Non-Invasive Diagnostic Approach for Diabetes Using Pulse Wave Analysis and Deep Learning
-
Published:2024-07-19
Issue:3
Volume:11
Page:51
-
ISSN:2227-9709
-
Container-title:Informatics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Informatics
Author:
Gunathilaka Hiruni12, Rajapaksha Rumesh3, Kumarika Thosini3, Perera Dinusha4, Herath Uditha5, Jayathilaka Charith1ORCID, Liyanage Janitha6, Kalingamudali Sudath1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Physics and Electronics, Faculty of Science, University of Kelaniya, Dalugama, Kelaniya 11600, Sri Lanka 2. Department of Rogavignana, Faculty of Indigenous Medicine, Gampaha Wickramarachchi University of Indigenous Medicine, Yakkala 11870, Sri Lanka 3. Department of Statistics & Computer Science, Faculty of Science, University of Kelaniya, Dalugama, Kelaniya 11600, Sri Lanka 4. Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama 11010, Sri Lanka 5. Colombo North Teaching Hospital, Ragama 11010, Sri Lanka 6. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Kelaniya, Dalugama, Kelaniya 11600, Sri Lanka
Abstract
The surging prevalence of diabetes globally necessitates advancements in non-invasive diagnostics, particularly for the early detection of cardiovascular anomalies associated with the condition. This study explores the efficacy of Pulse Wave Analysis (PWA) for distinguishing diabetic from non-diabetic individuals through morphological examination of pressure pulse waveforms. The research unfolds in four phases: data accrual, preprocessing, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model construction, and performance evaluation. Data were procured using a multipara patient monitor, resulting in 2000 pulse waves equally divided between healthy individuals and those with diabetes. These were used to train, validate, and test three distinct CNN architectures: the conventional CNN, Visual Geometry Group (VGG16), and Residual Networks (ResNet18). The accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score gauged each model’s proficiency. The CNN demonstrated a training accuracy of 82.09% and a testing accuracy of 80.6%. The VGG16, with its deeper structure, surpassed the baseline with training and testing accuracies of 90.2% and 86.57%, respectively. ResNet18 excelled, achieving a training accuracy of 92.50% and a testing accuracy of 92.00%, indicating its robustness in pattern recognition within pulse wave data. Deploying deep learning for diabetes screening marks progress, suggesting clinical use and future studies on bigger datasets for refinement.
Funder
Research and Publication Division at the University of Kelaniya
Reference32 articles.
1. Poleszczuk, J., Debowska, M., Dabrowski, W., Wojcik-Zaluska, A., Zaluska, W., and Waniewski, J. (2018). Subject-specific pulse wave propagation modeling: Towards enhancement of cardiovascular assessment methods. PLoS ONE, 13. 2. Proença, M., Renevey, P., Braun, F., Bonnier, G., Delgado-Gonzalo, R., Lemkaddem, A., Verjus, C., Ferrario, D., and Lemay, M. (2019). Pulse Wave Analysis Techniques. The Handbook of Cuffless Blood Pressure Monitoring, Springer. 3. Pulse Wave Analysis to Estimate Cardiac Output;Kouz;Anesthesiology,2021 4. Wu, H.T., Wu, H.K., Wang, C.L., Yang, Y.-L., Wu, W.-H., Tsai, T.-H., and Chang, H.-H. (2016). Modeling the Pulse Signal by Wave-Shape Function and Analyzing by Synchrosqueezing Transform. PLoS ONE, 11. 5. Micro-piezoelectric pulse diagnoser and frequency domain analysis of human pulse signals;Chang;J. Tradit. Chin. Med. Sci.,2018
|
|