The Therapy of Desire in Times of Crisis: Lessons Learned from Buddhism and Stoicism

Author:

Ding Xiaojun1ORCID,Ma Yueyao1,Yu Feng2,Abadal Lily M.3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Philosophy, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China

2. Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

3. Department of Philosophy, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA

Abstract

Desire is an important philosophical topic that deeply impacts everyday life. Philosophical practice is an emerging trend that uses philosophical theories and methods as a guide to living a eudaimonic life. In this paper, we define desire philosophically and compare different theories of desire in specific Eastern and Western traditions. Based on the Lacanian conceptual–terminological triad of “Need-Demand-Desire”, the research of desire is further divided into three dimensions, namely, the subject of desire, the object of desire, and the desire itself. The concept of desire is then analyzed from this triad and these three dimensions through different philosophical theories. This paper selects Buddhism as the representative of Eastern tradition, and Stoicism as the representative of the West, paying special attention to Stoicism’s “spiritual exercises” following Pierre Hadot. By exploring and comparing the Buddhist paths to liberation from suffering (i.e., the Four Noble Truths and the Noble Eightfold Path) and the two theoretical pillars in Stoicism (i.e., the notions of “living according to nature” and “the dichotomy of control”), practical guidance is then provided for understanding and regulating desire in times of crisis. This understanding and regulation of desire constitutes a philosophical therapy for today’s troubles, particularly those caused by excessive or irrational desires.

Funder

National Social Science Fund of China

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Religious studies

Reference181 articles.

1. Adam, Barbara (1998). Timescapes of Modernity: The Environment and Invisible Hazards, Routledge.

2. Albrow, Martin (1997). The Global Age: State and Society Beyond Modernity, Stanford University Press.

3. There is no Paradox of Desire in Buddhism;Alt;Philosophy East and West,1980

4. Ambury, James M., Irani, Tushar, and Wallace, Kathleen (2020). Philosophy as a Way of Life: Historical, Contemporary, and Pedagogical Perspectives, Wiley-Blackwell.

5. Amir, Lydia (2017). New Frontiers in Philosophical Practice, Cambridge Scholars Press.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3