Better Not to Use Vulnerability’s Reference for Exploitability Prediction

Author:

Yang HeedongORCID,Park Seungsoo,Yim Kangbin,Lee Manhee

Abstract

About half of all exploit codes will become available within about two weeks of the release date of its vulnerability. However, 80% of the released vulnerabilities are never exploited. Since putting the same effort to eliminate all vulnerabilities can be somewhat wasteful, software companies usually use different methods to assess which vulnerability is more serious and needs an immediate patch. Recently, there have been some attempts to use machine learning techniques to predict a vulnerability’s exploitability. In doing so, a vulnerability’s related URL, called its reference, is commonly used as a machine learning algorithm’s feature. However, we found that some references contained proof-of-concept codes. In this paper, we analyzed all references in the National Vulnerability Database and found that 46,202 of them contained such codes. We compared prediction performances between feature matrix with and without reference information. Experimental results showed that test sets that used references containing proof-of-concept codes had better prediction performance than ones that used references without such codes. Even though the difference is not huge, it is clear that references having answer information contributed to the prediction performance, which is not desirable. Thus, it is better not to use reference information to predict vulnerability exploitation.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Reference27 articles.

1. Vulnerability and Threat Trends https://lp.skyboxsecurity.com/rs/440-MPQ-510/images/Skybox_Report_Vulnerability_and_Threat_Trends_2019.pdf

2. Prioritization To Prediction Report https://www.kennasecurity.com/prioritization-to-prediction-report/images/Prioritization_to_Prediction.pdf

3. Beyond heuristics

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Survey on Software Vulnerability Exploitability Assessment;ACM Computing Surveys;2024-04-26

2. Vulnerability Assessment Framework Based on In-The-Wild Exploitability for Prioritizing Patch Application in Control System;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2024

3. Exploring topic models to discern cyber threats on Twitter: A case study on Log4Shell;Intelligent Systems with Applications;2023-11

4. Vulnerability Assessment Based on Real World Exploitability for Prioritizing Patch Applications;2023 7th Cyber Security in Networking Conference (CSNet);2023-10-16

5. Automated Calculation of CVSS v3.1 Temporal Score Based on Apache Log4j 2021 Vulnerabilities;2023 International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM);2023-09-21

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3