CO2 Leakage Scenarios in Shale Overburden

Author:

Currenti Gilda1,Cantucci Barbara1ORCID,Montegrossi Giordano23ORCID,Napoli Rosalba1,Misnan M. Shahir4,Rashidi M. Rashad Amir4,Abu Bakar Zainol Affendi4,Harith Zuhar Zahir Tuan5,Bahri Nabila Hannah Samsol5,Hashim Noorbaizura5

Affiliation:

1. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via di Vigna Murata 605, 00143 Rome, Italy

2. Centro Nazionale delle Ricerche-Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse, Via G. La Pira 4, 50121 Firenze, Italy

3. Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale per la Scienza e Tecnologia dei Materiali–INSTM, Via G. Giusti 9, 50121 Firenze, Italy

4. PETRONAS Research Sdn. Bhd, Bandar Baru Bangi 43650, Malaysia

5. AEM Energy Solutions Sdn. Bhd, Kuala Lumpur 50450, Malaysia

Abstract

Potential CO2 leakage from deep geologic reservoirs requires evaluation on a site-specific basis to assess risk and arrange mitigation strategies. In this study, a heterogeneous and realistic numerical model was developed to investigate CO2 migration pathways and uprising time in a shaly overburden, located in the Malaysian off-shore. Fluid flow and reactive transport simulations were performed by TOUGHREACT to evaluate the: (1) seepage through the caprock; (2) CO2-rich brine leakage through a fault connecting the reservoir with seabed. The effect of several factors, which may contribute to CO2 migration, including different rock types and permeability, Fickian and Knudsen diffusion and CO2 adsorption in the shales were investigated. Obtained results show that permeability mainly ruled CO2 uprising velocity and pathways. CO2 migrates upward by buoyancy without any important lateral leakages due to poor-connection of permeable layers and comparable values of vertical and horizontal permeability. Diffusive flux and the Knudsen flow are negligible with respect to the Darcy regime, despite the presence of shales. Main geochemical reactions deal with carbonate and pyrite weathering which easily reach saturation due to low permeability and allowing for re-precipitation as secondary phases. CO2 adsorption on shales together with dissolved CO2 constituted the main trapping mechanisms, although the former represents likely an overestimation due to estimated thermodynamic parameters. Developed models for both scenarios are validated by the good agreement with the pressure profiles recorded in the exploration wells and the seismic data along a fault (the F05 fault), suggesting that they can accurately reproduce the main processes occurring in the system.

Funder

PETRONAS Research Sdn. Bhd

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Reference71 articles.

1. Metz, B. (2005). Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press.

2. Metz, B., Davidson, O.R., Bosh, P.R., Dave, R., and Meyer, L.A. (2007). Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007, Cambridge University Press.

3. IPCC (2014). 2013 Revised Supplementary Methods and Good Practice Guidance Arising from the Kyoto Protocol, IPCC.

4. IEA (2009). Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme Natural and Industrial Analugues for Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide, IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme.

5. Risk of Leakage versus Depth of Injection in Geological Storage;Celia;Energy Procedia,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3