How Are a Firm’s Strategic Motives for Environmental Innovation Impeded? The Negative Influences of Institutional Pressures

Author:

Ra Keehyuk1,Hong Suengjae2,Yang Daegyu2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

2. School of Management, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea

Abstract

In recent years, firms are intensively being asked to build up the capabilities of dealing with environmental issues. While most firms are proactively inspired by their strategic motives for the environmental innovations, they are also exposed to the external pressures for environmental innovations that are institutionally established. This study is an early attempt to theoretically examine how firms’ strategic motives for environmental innovation are affected by the institutional pressures of environmental issues in a single empirical setting. Based on the institutional theory, this study suggests two types of institutional pressures — regulative and normative pressures— and proposes the conflicting effects of the strategic motive and the institutional pressures in the firms’ activities concerning environmental innovation. In addition to the test of the interrelated effects of strategic motives and institutional pressures, this study also investigates how small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) differ in their efforts to realize the strategic motives for environmental innovation, in contrast to large companies. The Korean Innovation Survey was used to test the proposed hypotheses. The findings of the analysis support all the hypotheses about the negative influences of institutional pressures on the effect of strategic motives on environmental innovation actions. Finally, the theoretical contributions and managerial implications are discussed.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Information Systems and Management,Computer Networks and Communications,Modeling and Simulation,Control and Systems Engineering,Software

Reference53 articles.

1. Heineman, B.W. (2023, January 20). The “Business in Society” Imperative for CEOs. Available online: https://hbr.org/2016/12/the-business-in-society-imperative-for-ceos.

2. A natural-resource-based view of the firm;Hart;Acad. Manag. Rev.,2015

3. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness;Porter;J. Econ. Perspect.,1995

4. Green innovation and financial performance: An institutional approach;Organ. Environ.,2013

5. Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries;Brunnermeier;J. Environ. Econ. Manag.,2003

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Healthcare Information Systems (HCIS) Customer Patient Advocacy;Advances in Business Information Systems and Analytics;2023-12-15

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3