Abstract
This study evaluated whether the straw burial and alternative wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation could improve the root activity, yield, and water utilization efficiency (WUE) of rice. Accordingly, we conducted a field experiment with three straw burial levels, i.e., with no straw burial (NSB), low straw burial 300 kg.ha−1 (LSB), and dense straw burial 800 kg.ha−1 (DSB), and three irrigation regimes, i.e., alternate wetting/moderate drying (AWMD), alternate wetting/severe drying (AWSD), and alternate wetting/critical drying (AWCD). Results showed that straw burial improved the root activity, rice yield, and WUE under AWD regimes. The combination AWMD×DSB resulted in the greatest values of total dry mass (1764.7 g/m2) and water use (853.1 mm). Conversely, the treatment AWCD × NSB led to the lowest values of total biomass (583.3 g/m2) and water use (321.8 mm). Root dry weight density (1.11 g cm−3) and root active absorption area (31.6 m2 plant−1) were higher in the treatment AWMD × DSB than root dry weight density (0.41 g cm−3) and root active absorption area (21.2 m2 plant−1) were in the treatment AWCD×NSB. The former combined treatment increased root oxidation ability (55.5 mg g−1 FWh−1), the root surface phosphatase activity (1.67 mg g−1 FWh−1) and nitrate reductase activity of root (14.4 μg g−1 h−1) while the latter considerably reduced the values of root oxidation ability (21.4 mg g−1 FWh−1), the root surface phosphatase activity (0.87 mg g−1 FWh−1) and nitrate reductase activity of root (5.8 μg g−1 h−1). The following conclusions can be drawn with regard to water use and biomass yield. (i) The reduction in water consumption was greater than the reduction in yield in the case of AWSD. (ii) The decline in water consumption was less than the decline in biomass yield in the case of AWCD. (iii) The increase in in water consumption was greater than the increase in biomass yield in the case of AWMD. Therefore, the indicators of WUE were recorded in the following order: AWSD > AWMD > AWCD. This study recommends AWD irrigation to improve the root growth traits that contribute to the greater biomass yield of rice. It also suggests that farmers should implement AWD irrigation after leaving wheat straw residues in the field, and followed by deep tillage, to mitigate the negative effect of drought stress caused by AWD irrigation, preserving plant growth without large biomass losses, and thus, addressing the constrains of straw residues and sustaining rice production under limited freshwater resources.
Funder
the Water Conservancy Science and Technology Project of Jiangsu Province
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference85 articles.
1. Deficit irrigation based on drought tolerance and root signalling in potatoes and tomatoes;Jensen;Agric. Water Manag.,2010
2. Oumarou Abdoulaye, A., Lu, H., Zhu, Y., Alhaj Hamoud, Y., and Sheteiwy, M. (2019). The global trend of the net irrigation water requirement of maize from 1960 to 2050. Climate, 7.
3. FAOSTAT (2013). Agricultural Production, FAOSTAT.
4. Buresh, R., and Haefele, S. (2010). Changes in Paddy Soils under Transition to Water-Saving and Diversified Cropping Systems, World Congress of Soil Science.
5. Bouman, B. (2007). Water Management in Irrigated Rice: Coping with Water Scarcity, International Rice Research Institute.