Affiliation:
1. Department of the Waste Management of the National Secretariat for Urban Environment and Environmental Quality, Ministry of Environment and Climate Change, Esplanada dos Ministérios Bloco B sala 736, Brasília 70068-900, Brazil
2. CTAC (Centre for Territory, Environment and Construction), University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal
3. Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Morro do Cruzeiro, Ouro Preto 35402-163, Brazil
Abstract
Municipal solid waste is a chronic problem in many developing countries like Brazil. Addressing the challenges of waste management requires robust frameworks for assessing the policies’ impacts. In this context, sustainability indicators may help decision-makers in adopting more efficient waste policies. The main goal of this study is to propose a framework for identifying and classifying indicators related to waste management within Brazilian public policies. This evaluation was based on extensive legislative surveys aimed at identifying goals, targets, and obligations outlined in these policies. A comprehensive Driving Force–Pressure–State–Impact–Response (DPSIR) framework was employed to identify and classify the usefulness of these indicators in the context of waste management. A total of 151 indicators were identified, alongside 283 waste goals, targets, and obligations, which were primarily related to municipal waste and were mostly sourced from plans, laws, presidential decrees, and collegiate resolutions. Within the framework, 66 indicators, mostly related to waste collection and recycling, were deemed useful, comprising 34 classified as Responses, 14 as Pressures, six as Driving Forces, four as States, two as Impacts, and six as Pressure/Responses. The challenges associated with the DPSIR framework and strategies to enhance the efficiency of public waste policies in Brazil are also discussed.
Reference80 articles.
1. Meadows, D. (1998). Indicators and Information Systems for Sustainable Development, The Sustainability Institute.
2. Government intervention in municipal waste collection with a sustainable approach: A robust bi-level problem;Rahmandoust;Environ. Dev. Sustain.,2023
3. A systemic approach to tackling ocean plastic debris;Ceylan;Environ. Syst. Decis.,2022
4. EEA—European Environment Agency (2014). Digest of EEA Indicators, Technical Report Nº 8.
5. Integrating life cycle assessment and multi criteria decision making for sustainable waste management: Key issues and recommendations for future studies;Torkayesh;Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.,2022
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献