Affiliation:
1. Laboratory for Human Craniofacial and Skeletal Identification (HuCS-ID Lab), School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
Abstract
When an unidentified skeleton is discovered, a video superimposition (VS) of the skull and a facial photograph may be undertaken to assist identification. In the first instance, the method is fundamentally a photographic one, requiring the overlay of two 2D photographic images at transparency for comparison. Presently, mathematical and anatomical techniques used to compare skull/face anatomy dominate superimposition discussions, however, little attention has been paid to the equally fundamental photographic prerequisites that underpin these methods. This predisposes error, as the optical parameters of the two comparison photographs are (presently) rarely matched prior to, or for, comparison. In this paper, we: (1) review the basic but critical photographic prerequisites that apply to VS; (2) propose a replacement for the current anatomy-centric searches for the correct ‘skull pose’ with a photographic-centric camera vantage point search; and (3) demarcate superimposition as a clear two-stage phased procedure that depends first on photographic parameter matching, as a prerequisite to undertaking any anatomical comparison(s).
Reference85 articles.
1. Wilkinson, C.M., and Rynn, C. (2012). Craniofacial Identification, Cambridge University Press.
2. Craniofacial photographic superimposition: New developments;Ubelaker;Forensic Sci. Int. Synergy,2019
3. Blau, S., and Ubelaker, D.H. (2016). Handbook of Forensic Anthropology and Archaeology, Left Coast Press. [2nd ed.].
4. Clement, J.G., and Ranson, D.L. (1998). Craniofacial Identification in Forensic Medicine, Hodder Arnold.
5. Study on the performance of different craniofacial superimposition approaches (II): Best practices proposal;Damas;Forensic Sci. Int.,2015