Affiliation:
1. The Institute of Optics, University of Rochester, 480 Intercampus Drive, Rochester, NY 14627, USA
Abstract
Reimaging telescopes have an accessible exit pupil that facilitates stray light mitigation and matching to auxiliary optical systems. Freeform surfaces present the opportunity for unobscured reflective systems to be folded into geometries that are otherwise impracticable with conventional surface types. It is critical, however, to understand the limitations of the enabled folding geometries and choose the one that best balances the optical performance and mechanical requirements. Here, we used the aberration theory of freeform surfaces to determine the aberration correction potential for using freeform surfaces in reimaging three-mirror telescopes and established a hierarchy for the different folding geometries without using optimization. We found that when using freeform optics, the ideal folding geometry had 9× better wavefront performance compared to the next best geometry. Within that ideal geometry, the system using freeform optics had 39% better wavefront performance compared to a system using off-axis asphere surfaces, thus quantifying one of the advantages of freeform optics in this design space.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Reference35 articles.
1. Rogers, J.R., and Tachihara, S. (1986). Practical Tilted Mirror Systems. Current Developments in Optical Engineering and Diffraction Phenomena, SPIE. Proc. SPIE 0679.
2. Rogers, J.R. (1985, January 10–13). Vector Aberration Theory and the Design of off-Axis Systems. Proceedings of the International Lens Design Conference, Cherry Hill, NJ, USA. Proc. SPIE 0554.
3. Cook, L.G. (1981). Three Mirror Anastigmatic Optical System. (No. 4,265,510), US Patent.
4. Wetherell, W.B., and Womble, D.A. (1980). All-Reflective Three Element Objective. (No. 4,240,707), US Patent.
5. Rodgers, J.M. (2002, January 3). Unobscured mirror designs. Proceedings of the International Optical Design Conference, Tucson, AZ, USA. Proc. SPIE 4832.