Effect of Photoaging on the Structure, Optical Properties and Roughness of One-Shade Composite Restoratives
-
Published:2024-08-26
Issue:9
Volume:15
Page:245
-
ISSN:2079-4983
-
Container-title:Journal of Functional Biomaterials
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JFB
Author:
Petropoulou Aikaterini1ORCID, Dimitriadi Maria2, Zinelis Spiros2ORCID, Antoniadou Maria3ORCID, Eliades George2
Affiliation:
1. Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 2 Thivon Str., 11527 Athens, Greece 2. Department of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 2 Thivon Str., 11527 Athens, Greece 3. Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 2 Thivon Str., 11527 Athens, Greece
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate changes in the degree of C=C conversion (DC%), chemical structure, optical properties and roughness of one-shade composites before/after photoaging. Τhe one-shade materials tested were Charisma Topaz One (CHT), Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Universal (MES), Essentia Universal (ESU) and Omnichroma (OMN), with G-aenial Anterior (CNA) serving as control. Specimens (2 mm thickness) were prepared and tested for DC% and chemical structure (ATR–FTIR spectroscopy), optical properties (L*a*b*–ΔΕ, translucency parameter–TP, opalescence parameter–OP, contrast ratio–CR and total transmittance–TT by UV–Vis spectroscopy) and roughness (Sa, Sz, Sdr, Sds and Sc by optical profilometry) before and after photoaging (Xe-arc weatherometer). Significant differences were found in DC% between top–bottom surfaces (ESU, OMN before; ESU, CNA after). Photoaging improved DC%, reduced ester peaks implying photodegradation, reduced L* (CHT, OMN, CNA), a* (CHT, CNA), b* (OMN, CNA), TP (all, except for MES), OP (only MES), CR (only MES, but an increase in CNA) and TT (CHT, OMN). OMN, CNA and MES demonstrated ΔΕ > 3.3. Photoaging significantly increased all roughness parameters in all materials, except for MES (Sz, Sdr, Sc) and OMN (Sdr). Although listed in the same group, significant differences were found in one-shade composites before and after photoaging. Several products were strongly affected by photoaging, demonstrating evidence of photodegradation, an increased roughness and color changes exceeding the clinically acceptable levels.
Reference56 articles.
1. Voids and Interlayer Gaps in Class 1 Posterior Composite Restorations: A Comparison between a Microlayer and a 2-Layer Technique;Samet;Quintessence Int.,2006 2. Smart Monochromatic Composite: A Literature Review;Ahmed;Int. J. Dent.,2022 3. AlHamdan, E.M., Bashiri, A., Alnashmi, F., Al-Saleh, S., Al-shahrani, K., Al-shahrani, S., Alsharani, A., Alzahrani, K.M., Alqarawi, F.K., and Vohra, F. (2021). Evaluation of smart chromatic technology for a single-shade dental polymer resin: An in vitro study. Appl. Sci. Switz., 11. 4. Prodan, C.M., Gasparik, C., Ruiz-López, J., and Dudea, D. (2023). Color and Translucency Variation of a One-Shaded Resin-Based Composite after Repeated Heating Cycles and Staining. Mater. Basel Switz., 16. 5. (2024, March 24). Omnichroma Technical Report, Tokuyama Corp., Tokyo. Available online: https://omnichroma.com/us/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2019/01/OMNI-Tech-Report-Color-Final.pdf.
|
|