Abstract
The adverse human health effects as a result of antimicrobial resistance have been recognized worldwide. Salmonella is a leading cause of foodborne illnesses while antimicrobial resistant (AMR) Salmonella has been isolated from foods of animal origin. The quantitative risk assessment (RA) as part of the guidelines for the risk analysis of foodborne antimicrobial resistance was issued by the Codex Alimentarius Commission more than a decade ago. However, only two risk assessments reported the human health effects of AMR Salmonella in dry-cured pork sausage and pork mince. Therefore, the objective of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the adverse health effects attributable to consuming retail pork contaminated with Salmonella using risk assessment models. The sampling frame covered pork at the fresh market (n = 100) and modern trade where pork is refrigerated (n = 50) in Chiang Mai province in northern Thailand. The predictive microbiology models were used in the steps where data were lacking. Susceptible and quinolone-resistant (QR) Salmonella were determined by antimicrobial susceptibility testing and the presence of AMR genes. The probability of mortality conditional to foodborne illness by susceptible Salmonella was modeled as the hazard characterization of susceptible and QR Salmonella. For QR Salmonella, the probabilistic prevalences from the fresh market and modern trade were 28.4 and 1.9%, respectively; the mean concentrations from the fresh market and modern trade were 346 and 0.02 colony forming units/g, respectively. The probability of illness (PI) and probability of mortality given illness (PMI) from QR Salmonella-contaminated pork at retails in Chiang Mai province were in the range of 2.2 × 10−8–3.1 × 10−4 and 3.9 × 10−10–5.4 × 10−6, respectively, while those from susceptible Salmonella contaminated-pork at retails were in the range 1.8 × 10−4–3.2 × 10−4 and 2.3 × 10−7–4.2 × 10−7, respectively. After 1000 iterations of Monte Carlo simulations of the risk assessment models, the annual mortality rates for QR salmonellosis simulated by the risk assessment models were in the range of 0–32, which is in line with the AMR adverse health effects previously reported. Therefore, the risk assessment models used in both exposure assessment and hazard characterization were applicable to evaluate the adverse health effects of AMR Salmonella spp. in Thailand.
Funder
Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute
Subject
Plant Science,Health Professions (miscellaneous),Health (social science),Microbiology,Food Science
Reference58 articles.
1. Antimicrobial Resistance Risk Assessment
2. One Health drivers of antibacterial resistance: Quantifying the relative impacts of human, animal and environmental use and transmission
3. Health and economic impacts of antimicrobial resistant infections in Thailand: A Preliminary Study;Phumart;J. Health Syst. Res.,2012
4. Guidelines for Risk Analysis of Foodborne Antimicrobial Resistance (CXG 77-2011),2011
5. Principles and Guidelines for the Conduct of Microbiological Risk Assessment (CAC/GL-30),1999