SiO2/SiC Nanowire Surfaces as a Candidate Biomaterial for Bone Regeneration
Author:
Ghezzi Benedetta12ORCID, Attolini Giovanni2, Bosi Matteo2ORCID, Negri Marco2, Lagonegro Paola3, Rotonda Pasquale M.4, Cornelissen Christine4, Macaluso Guido Maria12ORCID, Lumetti Simone12
Affiliation:
1. Centro Universitario di Odontoiatria, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università di Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43123 Parma, Italy 2. IMEM-CNR, Parco Area delle Scienze 37A, 43124 Parma, Italy 3. CNR-SCITEC, Via A. Corti 12, 20133 Milano, Italy 4. Lintes Research Laboratory, Via Isola 2, 64010 Colonnella, Italy
Abstract
Tissue engineering (TE) and nanomedicine require devices with hydrophilic surfaces to better interact with the biological environment. This work presents a study on the wettability of cubic silicon-carbide-based (SiC) surfaces. We developed four cubic silicon-carbide-based epitaxial layers and three nanowire (NW) substrates. Sample morphologies were analyzed, and their wettabilities were quantified before and after a hydrogen plasma treatment to remove impurities due to growth residues and enhance hydrophilicity. Moreover, sample biocompatibility has been assessed with regard to L929 cells. Our results showed that core–shell nanowires (SiO2/SiC NWs), with and without hydrogen plasma treatment, are the most suitable candidate material for biological applications due to their high wettability that is not influenced by specific treatments. Biological tests underlined the non-toxicity of the developed biomaterials with regard to murine fibroblasts, and the proliferation assay highlighted the efficacy of all the surfaces with regard to murine osteoblasts. In conclusion, SiO2/SiC NWs offer a suitable substrate to develop platforms and membranes useful for biomedical applications in tissue engineering due to their peculiar characteristics.
Subject
Inorganic Chemistry,Condensed Matter Physics,General Materials Science,General Chemical Engineering
Reference57 articles.
1. Comparative study of seeding methods for three-dimensional polymeric scaffolds;Burg;J. Biomed. Mater. Res.,2000 2. Gugliandolo, A., Fonticoli, L., Trubiani, O., Rajan, T.S., Marconi, G.D., Bramanti, P., Mazzon, E., Pizzicannella, J., and Diomede, F. (2021). Oral Bone Tissue Regeneration: Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Secretome, and Biomaterials. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22. 3. Tissue engineering; strategies, tissues, and biomaterials;Bakhshandeh;Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev.,2017 4. Biomaterials for bone regeneration: An orthopedic and dentistry overview;Kerstner;Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res.,2021 5. Battafarano, G., Rossi, M., De Martino, V., Marampon, F., Borro, L., Secinaro, A., and Del Fattore, A. (2021). Strategies for Bone Regeneration: From Graft to Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22.
|
|