Spatial Pattern and Drivers of China’s Public Cultural Facilities between 2012 and 2020 Based on POI and Statistical Data

Author:

Zhao Kaixu1ORCID,Cao Xiaoteng2,Wu Fengqi3,Chen Chao24

Affiliation:

1. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China

2. College of Architecture, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China

3. Graduate School, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China

4. State Key Laboratory of Green Building in Western China, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China

Abstract

In the context of globalization and the intensification of international competition, the construction of public cultural facilities has long been not limited to meeting the cultural needs of the people but has become an important initiative to shape the competitiveness of cities. This paper collected POI and socio-economic statistics from 2012 to 2020 from 285 Chinese cities and employed the coefficient of variation (CV), Gini index (GI), ESDA, and GeoDetector to analyze the spatial patterns and driving mechanisms of public cultural facilities. Findings: (1) Public cultural facilities in Chinese cities were featured by evident regional gradient differences and uneven spatial distributions, with a CV greater than 1.3 and a GI greater than 0.5 in both years. They also showed signs of aggregation at weak levels, with a Moran I of 0.15 in both years and a cluster pattern of “hot in the east and cold in the west”. (2) Different types of public cultural facilities had differences in their differentiation, aggregation, and change trends. The CV changed from 1.39~2.69 to 1.06~1.92, and the GI changed from 0.53~0.80 to 0.47~0.62, with the differentiation of libraries, museums, theaters, art galleries, and cultural centers decreasing gradually, while that of exhibition halls increased day by day. As the Moran I increased from 0.08~0.20 to 0.12~0.24, libraries, museums, art galleries, and cultural centers showed weak aggregation with an increasingly strong trend. Theaters and exhibition halls also showed weak aggregation but in a declining trend, with the Moran I changing from 0.15~1.19 to 0.09~0.1. (3) The five driving variables exhibit significant differences in their strength across time and across regions, with the economic and infrastructure factors being the strongest and the urbanization factor the weakest. There are significant differences in the strength of the driving forces among the factors, with the total retail sales of consumers, the number of subscribers to internet services, regular higher education institutions, and undergraduates in regular HEIs playing both direct and interactive roles as the core factors. (4) The 285 cities in China are divided into four policy zonings of star, cow, question, and dog cities. Star cities should maintain their status quo without involving too much policy intervention, whereas the core and important factors should be the focus of policy in dog cities and cow cities, and the auxiliary factors should be the focus of policy in question cities. This paper contributes to the in-depth knowledge of the development pattern of public cultural facilities and provides a more refined basis for the formulation of public cultural facility promotion policies in China and similar countries.

Funder

third topic of the National Key R&D Program for China’s 14th Five-Year Plan

Independent Research and Development Project of State Key Laboratory of Green Building in Western China

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Computers in Earth Sciences,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference66 articles.

1. State Council of PRC (2023, February 20). Regulations on Public Cultural and Sports Facilities (2003), Available online: http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2003/content_62275.htm.

2. National People’s Congress of PRC (2023, February 20). Public Cultural Service Guarantee Law of the People’s Republic of China, Available online: http://www.npc.gov.cn/zgrdw/npc/xinwen/2016-12/25/content_2004880.htm.

3. He, D., Chen, Z., Ai, S., Zhou, J., Lu, L., and Yang, T. (2021). The spatial distribution and influencing factors of urban cultural and entertainment facilities in Beijing. Sustainability, 13.

4. Jóźwiak, M., Sieg, P., and Posadzińska, I. (2022). Revitalization of Mill Island cultural facilities as a factor of the region’s attractiveness and competitiveness. Sustainability, 14.

5. Chang, X., Wu, Z., Chen, Y., Du, Y., Shang, L., Ge, Y., Chang, J., and Yang, G. (2021). The booming number of museums and their inequality changes in China. Sustainability, 13.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3