Physical, Thermal, and Chemical Properties of Fly Ash Cenospheres Obtained from Different Sources

Author:

Shishkin Andrei1ORCID,Abramovskis Vitalijs1,Zalite Ilmars2ORCID,Singh Ashish Kumar1,Mezinskis Gundars2,Popov Vladimir3ORCID,Ozolins Jurijs1

Affiliation:

1. Rudolfs Cimdins Riga Biomaterials Innovations and Development Centre of RTU, Institute of General Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Materials Science and Applied Chemistry, Riga Technical University, Pulka 3, K-3, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia

2. Institute of Materials and Surface Technologies of the Riga Technical University, P. Valdena iela 7, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia

3. Department of Materials and Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel

Abstract

Cenospheres are hollow particles in fly ash, a by-product of coal burning, and are widely used as a reinforcement when developing low-density composites called syntactic foams. This study has investigated the physical, chemical, and thermal properties of cenospheres obtained from three different sources, designated as CS1, CS2, and CS3, for the development of syntactic foams. Cenospheres with particle sizes ranging from 40 to 500 μm were studied. Different particle distribution by size was observed, and the most uniform distribution of CS particles was in the case of CS2: above 74% with dimensions from 100 to 150 μm. The CS bulk had a similar density for all samples and amounted to around 0.4 g·cm−3, with a particle shell material density of 2.1 g·cm−3. Post-heat-treatment samples showed the development of a SiO2 phase in the cenospheres, which was not present in the as-received product. CS3 had the highest quantity of Si compared to the other two, showing the difference in source quality. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry and a chemical analysis of the CS revealed that the main components of the studied CS were SiO2 and Al2O3. In the case of CS1 and CS2, the sum of these components was on average from 93 to 95%. In the case of CS3, the sum of SiO2 and Al2O3 did not exceed 86%, and Fe2O3 and K2O were present in appreciable quantities in CS3. Cenospheres CS1 and CS2 did not sinter during heat treatment up to 1200 °C, while sample CS3 was already subjected to sintering at 1100 °C because of the presence of a quartz phase, Fe2O3 and K2O. For the application of a metallic layer and subsequent consolidation via spark plasma sintering, CS2 can be deemed the most physically, thermally, and chemically suitable.

Funder

Riga Technical University

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Materials Science

Reference48 articles.

1. Gupta, N. (2014). Metal Matrix Syntactic Foams: Processing, Microstructure, Properties and Applications, DEStech Publications, Inc.

2. John, B., and Nair, C. (2010). Update on Syntactic Foams, iSmithers.

3. A Review on Closed Cell Metal Matrix Syntactic Foams: A Green Initiative towards Eco-Sustainability;Thiyagarajan;Mater. Manuf. Process.,2021

4. Tensile Properties of All-Polymeric Syntactic Foam Composites: Experimental Characterization and Mathematical Modelling;Yousaf;Compos. Part B Eng.,2022

5. Additive Manufacturing of Syntactic Foams: Part 2: Specimen Printing and Mechanical Property Characterization;Singh;JOM,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3