Collaborative Conservation for Inclusive, Equitable, and Effective Systems of Protected and Conserved Areas—Insights from Brazil

Author:

Maretti Cláudio C.1ORCID,Furlan Sueli Angelo12,Irving Marta de Azevedo345,Nasri Yasmin Xavier Guimarães3ORCID,Rodrigues Camila Gonçalves de Oliveira6ORCID,Aydos Beatriz Barros7,Martins dos Santos Rodrigo1ORCID,Guimarães Erika8ORCID,Marinelli Carlos Eduardo9,Fukuda Juliana C.10,Guirao Ângela Cruz11,Cardoso Luciano Régis12ORCID,Oliveira Elizabeth5,Moraes Edilaine A. de13,Fernandes-Pinto Érika10,Tiburcio Ana Celina14ORCID,da Costa Paula Chamy P.15ORCID,Raimundo Sidnei161718ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Geography (DGEO), Faculty of Philosophy, Languages and Human Sciences (FFLCH), University of São Paulo (USP), Sao Paulo 05508-080, SP, Brazil

2. Postgraduation Program on Physical Geography, DGEO FFLCH, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-080, SP, Brazil

3. Postgraduation Program on Communities Psychosociology and Social Ecology (EICOS), Psychology Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941-617, RJ, Brazil

4. Economics Institute, Postgraduation Program on Policies, Strategies and Development, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro 21941-617, RJ, Brazil

5. Brazilian College of Advanced Studies (CBAE), UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro 21941-617, RJ, Brazil

6. Postgraduation Program on Sustainable Development Practices, Department of Administration and Tourism, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ), Rio de Janeiro 23890-000, RJ, Brazil

7. Foundation for Amazon Sustainability, São Paulo 05468-901, SP, Brazil

8. Aretê Socioambiental, Lauro de Freitas 42700-000, BA, Brazil

9. Amazon Research National Institute (INPA), Manaus 69067-005, AM, Brazil

10. Chico Mendes Biodiversity Conservation Institute (ICMBio), Brasília 70670-350, DF, Brazil

11. Department of Green and Sustainable Development, Secretariat of Green, Environment and Sustainable Development, Municipality of Campinas, Campinas 13015-904, SP, Brazil

12. Mamirauá Sustainable Development Institute (IDSM), Tefé 69553-225, AM, Brazil

13. Department of Tourism, Institute of Human Sciences, Research Group on Community-Based Tourism, Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora 36036-900, MG, Brazil

14. Organa Eco-Communications, São José dos Campos 12247-004, SP, Brazil

15. Research Group on Conservation and Management of Natural Resources of Common Use (CGCommons), Nucleus for Environmental Studies and Research (NEPAM), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-970, SP, Brazil

16. Leisure and Tourism Undergraduate Course, School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities (EACH), University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo 05508-080, SP, Brazil

17. UNESCO Network on Culture, Tourism and Development, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo 05508-080, SP, Brazil

18. Research Group on Socioenvironmental Dynamics and Territorial Policies, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo 05508-080, SP, Brazil

Abstract

Protected and conserved areas (PCAs) are increasingly recognized as essential tools for their effectiveness in conservation and the benefits they provide. However, their challenges are still significant. The concepts, legislation, and governance surrounding PCAs are the results of social contexts. Due to the evolution of scientific knowledge, human rights, and diversified demands, new approaches are necessary to fulfill their functions. To better understand the context and possibilities, a study group was established to evaluate the current research, exchange experiences, guide dialogues, and identify lessons from experiences. The core of the experiences and cases considered and the reflections developed focused on the Brazilian context. This article analyzes the collected information and reflections related to several themes associated with challenges. The results reinforce the importance of PCAs but warn about the limitations of current conservation strategies to respond to social actors’ expectations, the needs of the vulnerable social groups, and evolving demands. The complexity of PCA systems is evident in view of the multiplicity of interests, potential contributions, and possibilities for participatory arrangements. There is a need to improve management and governance conceptions to promote the reconnection between society and nature. Therefore, the concept of collaborative conservation is proposed as an instrumental approach to advance towards inclusive and effective conservation strategies.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3