Conceptualising Marine Biodiversity Mainstreaming as an Enabler of Regional Sustainable Blue Growth: The Case of the European Atlantic Area
-
Published:2023-12-12
Issue:24
Volume:15
Page:16762
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Kyriazi Zacharoula12ORCID, de Almeida Leonor Ribeiro3, Marhadour Agnès2, Kelly Christina4, Flannery Wesley4, Murillas-Maza Arantza5ORCID, Kalaydjian Régis6, Farrell Desiree7ORCID, Carr Liam M.7ORCID, Norton Daniel8, Hynes Stephen8
Affiliation:
1. MaREI, The SFI Centre for Energy, Climate and Marine, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, P43C573 Ringaskiddy, Ireland 2. Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigação Marinha e Ambiental, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal 3. Portuguese Institute for Sea and Atmosphere, 1749-077 Lisboa, Portugal 4. School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK 5. AZTI—Ciencia y Tecnología Marina y Alimentaria—Sustainable Fisheries Management, 48395 Sukarrieta, Spain 6. French Institute for Ocean Science-Ifremer, 29280 Plouzané, France 7. School of Geography, Archaeology & Irish Studies, National University of Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland 8. Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit (SEMRU), National University of Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland
Abstract
After recognizing the importance of marine and coastal resources and the use of marine space for economic growth, the European Union (EU) created and implemented a long-term Blue Economy (BE) strategy that supports the development of traditional and emerging marine and maritime sectors, aiming at the enhancement of Blue Growth (BG). However, despite the existence of a robust policy framework that supports the expansion of BE sectors at both an EU Sea Basin and state level, scholars have been sceptical as to whether the pursuit of BG adequately addresses the challenges that usually come with economic development, including those of climate change and marine biodiversity loss. Various frameworks for integrating sectoral goals with each other and with environmental goals that could facilitate the transition towards Sustainable Blue Growth (SBG) already exist and have been suggested and promoted by the European Commission, such as Ecosystem-Based Management (EBM) and Marine Spatial Planning (MSP). They require the consideration of marine ecosystems and biodiversity and their protection as one of the BE sectors to be integrated via planning and management, which in turn requires the estimation of the value of ecosystem services and the spatial implications thereof. Nonetheless, there is little evidence or real-world examples on whether and how ecosystems, and within them coastal and marine biodiversity, are actually integrated (i.e., mainstreamed) when developing sectoral policies and planning and implementing economic activities at sea at various scales, i.e., local, national, and regional, and what the necessary steps and actions are that would facilitate such mainstreaming. By seeking evidence in EU and Atlantic Arc (AA) member states’ sectoral policies on marine tourism, ports and shipping, marine renewable energy, and fisheries and aquaculture (as promoted by the Atlantic Maritime Strategy and its corresponding action plans) and in the outcomes of the Interreg Atlantic Funded Research Project MOSES (aiming at valuating a Sustainable Blue Economy at the national and regional scale of the EU AA), the present article focused on understanding if and how marine biodiversity is taken into consideration by EU and AA BE and/or BG policies, strategies, and sectoral developments. Τhe selected sectoral policies demonstrate a good uptake of marine-ecosystem- and biodiversity-related challenges; however, at both the EU and the AA member-state level, it is unclear whether and how marine ecosystems and biodiversity are addressed as a separate BE sector. As such, we argue why and how Marine Biodiversity Mainstreaming (MBM) could address this gap, and hence it could contribute to planning, implementing, and managing maritime economic activities towards SBG at the Sea Basin level. This is demonstrated by illustrating the central role of MBM in enabling (and being further enabled by) the above integrative frameworks (i.e., MSP and EBM) and by presenting the key elements and actions required for such facilitation.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference71 articles.
1. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2012). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Blue Growth Opportunities for Marine and Maritime Sustainable Growth, The Official Journal of the European Union. 13.9.2012 COM(2012) 494 final. 2. ECORYS (2012). Blue Growth. Scenarios and Drivers for Sustainable Growth from the Oceans, Seas and Coasts, ECORYS Nederland BV.. Final Report. 3. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2019). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, The Official Journal of the European Union. The European Green Deal/COM/2019/640 final. 4. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2021). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. On a New Approach for a Sustainable Blue Economy in the EU Transforming the EU’s Blue Economy for a Sustainable Future, The Official Journal of the European Union. COM(2021) 240 final. 5. (2023, September 06). EU Sea Basins. Available online: https://oceans-and-fisheries.ec.europa.eu/ocean/sea-basins/eu-sea-basins_en.
|
|