Informed Consent in Clinical Training: Perspectives from Medical Students and Faculty in Portugal

Author:

Moreira Carolina Frade1ORCID,Costa-Santos Cristina2ORCID,Moreira Bárbara Frade3ORCID,Nunes Rui4ORCID,Duarte Ivone2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal

2. Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences (MEDCIDS)–Technology and Services Research–CINTESIS @ RISE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal

3. Department of General and Family Medicine, Family Health Unit Caminhos do Cértoma, Coimbra Local Health Unit, 3050-428 Pampilhosa, Portugal

4. Center of Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal

Abstract

The student–patient relationship represents the cornerstone of medical education, shaping future doctors’ knowledge, skills and attitudes. While most patients allow student involvement in their care, some may express discomfort. Thus, obtaining explicit consent is essential to respect patients’ right of autonomy. This study mainly aims to assess the practical application of informed consent by medical students and teachers regarding students’ presence and participation in patients’ care. An observational cross-sectional study was performed, and an online questionnaire was given to students and teachers at a single medical school, via institutional email. The study included 289 participants, namely 232 students and 57 teachers. While 81% of teachers reported always asking the patient’s consent for students’ presence, only 28% of students claimed this to be the case. Despite challenges like overcrowding and limited time, involving students in healthcare benefits both students and patients. Moreover, medical ethics education is crucial to foster compassionate care and promote ethical reasoning. The disparities found between teachers’ practices and students’ perspectives highlight the need to intervene and provide them with an adequate education on ethical values in clinical practice. Strategic interventions at institutional levels are required for a simultaneous high quality of patient care and clinical training.

Funder

National Funds through FCT–Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., within CINTESIS, R&D Unit

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3