Something Happened with the Way We Work: Evaluating the Implementation of the Reducing Coercion in Norway (ReCoN) Intervention in Primary Mental Health Care

Author:

Husum Tonje Lossius1,Wormdahl Irene2ORCID,Kjus Solveig H. H.3,Hatling Trond3,Rugkåsa Jorun145

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0166 Oslo, Norway

2. Department of Mental Health Work, NTNU Social Research, 7491 Trondheim, Norway

3. Norwegian Resource Centre for Community Mental Health, NTNU Social Research, 7491 Trondheim, Norway

4. Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway

5. Centre for Care Research, University of South-Eastern Norway, 3918 Porsgrunn, Norway

Abstract

Background: Current policies to reduce the use of involuntary admissions are largely oriented towards specialist mental health care and have had limited success. We co-created, with stakeholders in five Norwegian municipalities, the ‘Reducing Coercion in Norway’ (ReCoN) intervention that aims to reduce involuntary admissions by improving the way in which primary mental health services work and collaborate. The intervention was implemented in five municipalities and is being tested in a cluster randomized control trial, which is yet to be published. The present study evaluates the implementation process in the five intervention municipalities. To assess how the intervention was executed, we report on how its different elements were implemented, and what helped or hindered implementation. Methods: We assessed the process using qualitative methods. Data included detailed notes from quarterly progress interviews with (i) intervention coordinators and representatives from (ii) user organisations and (iii) carer organisations. Finally, an end-of-intervention evaluation seminar included participants from across the sites. Results: The majority of intervention actions were implemented. We believe this was enabled by the co-creating process, which ensured ownership and a good fit for the local setting. The analysis of facilitators and barriers showed a high degree of interconnectedness between different parts of the intervention so that success (or lack thereof) in one area affected the success in others. Future implementation should pay attention to enhanced planning and training, clarify the role and contribution of service user and carer involvement, and pay close attention to the need for implementation support and whether this should be external or internal to services. Conclusions: It is feasible to implement a complex intervention designed to reduce the use of involuntary admissions in general support services, such as the Norwegian primary mental health services. This could have implications for national and international policy aimed at reducing the use of involuntary care.

Funder

Research Council of Norway

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference52 articles.

1. Whittington, R., Aluh, D.O., and Caldas-de-Almeida, J.-M. (2023). Zero Tolerance for Coercion? Historical, Cultural and Organisational Contexts for Effective Implementation of Coercion-Free Mental Health Services around the World. Healthcare, 11.

2. Council of Europe (2021). Good Pratices in the Council of Europe to Promote Voluntary Measures in Mental Health Services, Council of Europe.

3. The, L. (2018). Institutional and coercive mental health treatment in Europe. Lancet, 391.

4. World Health Organization (2021). Hospital-Based Mental Health Services: Promoting Person-Centred and Rights-Based Approaches, World Health Organization.

5. Service user perspectives on coercion and restraint in mental health;Good;BJPsych. Int.,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3