The Importance of the International Community in Protecting the Right to Abortion: The Cases of Malta and of the US Supreme Court

Author:

Cioffi Andrea12ORCID,Cecannecchia Camilla3ORCID,Cipolloni Luigi1ORCID,Santurro Alessandro2ORCID,Cioffi Fernanda4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Legal Medicine, University of Foggia, 71100 Foggia, Italy

2. Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy

3. Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy

4. Fertilitas Day Surgery Reproductive Medicine, 84127 Salerno, Italy

Abstract

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), abortion is often necessary and is not a criminalizable medical act. Unfortunately, despite the global trend in recent years tending towards liberalization of abortion as a fundamental right of women in certain circumstances, it is still not guaranteed in all countries of the world in the same way. Moreover, the abortion debate is often characterized by unscientific opinions based on political and/or religious ideologies. Recently, a European episode has rekindled the debate on abortion: in Malta, a tourist was unable to have an abortion, with consequent risks, even serious ones, on her health. In addition, even in the United States a Supreme Court ruling created a considerable stir: the Roe v. Wade (1973) ruling that had legalized abortion at the federal level was revoked. After the ruling of the Supreme Court, each state of the USA can decide for itself whether and how to legalize abortion. These recent international developments are particularly worrying and make even more evident the need for abortion to be protected at an international level as an inalienable and fundamental human right, and therefore not to be limited.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference74 articles.

1. (1946). Constitution of the World Health Organization. Am. J. Public Health, 36, 1315–1323.

2. WHO (2022, November 10). Abortion. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/abortion#tab=tab_1.

3. United Nations (2022, November 15). United Nations Treaty Collection. Depositary. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. January 1976. Available online: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=IV-3&chapter=4&clang=_en.

4. (2022, October 01). UN General Assembly, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 16 December 1966, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 993, p. 3. Available online: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b36c0.html.

5. (2022, November 10). Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo. 5–12 September 1994. Available online: https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/programme_of_action_Web%20ENGLISH.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3