Factors Impacting Advance Decision Making and Health Care Agent Appointment among Taiwanese Urban Residents after the Passage of Patient Right to Autonomy Act

Author:

Wu Yi-Ling1,Yang Chun-Yi12,Lin Tsai-Wen3ORCID,Shen Pei-Han1,Tsai Zong-Dar1,Liu Ching-Nu1,Hsu Chia-Chen1,Wang Samuel Shih-Chih2ORCID,Huang Sheng-Jean4

Affiliation:

1. Taipei City Hospital, Taipei 103212, Taiwan

2. Department of Health and Welfare, Tian-Mu Campus, College of City Management, University of Taipei, Taipei 111036, Taiwan

3. National Academy of Education Research, Taipei 237201, Taiwan

4. National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100225, Taiwan

Abstract

In recent years, advance care planning (ACP) promotion in Taiwan has expanded beyond clinical practice to the broader population. This study aims to investigate people’s attitudes toward ACP and to identify factors influencing their signing of advance directives (ADs) and appointment of health care agents (HCAs). Methods: We identified 2337 ACP participants from consultation records between 2019 and 2020. The relationships among the participants’ characteristics, AD completion, and HCA appointment were investigated. Results: Of 2337 cases, 94.1% completed ADs and 87.8% were appointed HCAs. Welfare entitlement (OR = 0.47, p < 0.001), the place ACP progressed (OR = 0.08, p < 0.001), the participation of second-degree relatives (OR = 2.50, p < 0.001), and the intention of not being a family burden (OR = 1.65, p = 0.010) were significantly correlated with AD completion. The probability of appointing HCAs was higher in participants with family caregiving experience (OR = 1.42, p < 0.05), who were single (OR = 1.49, p < 0.05), and who expected a good death with dignity (OR = 1.65, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Our research shows that adopting ACP discussion in Taiwan is feasible, which encourages ACP conversation and facilitates AD completion. Implications: Male and younger adults may need extra encouragement to discuss ACP matters with their families. Limitations: due to sampling restrictions, our data were chosen from an urban district to ensure the integrity of the results. Furthermore, interview data could be collected in future research to supplement the quantitative results.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference44 articles.

1. Sources of concern about the Patient Self-Determination Act;Wolf;N. Engl. J. Med.,1991

2. Ethical decision making and patient autonomy: A comparison of physicians and patients in Japan and the United States;Ruhnke;Chest,2000

3. Patients’ attitudes toward advance directives;Douglas;J. Nurs. Sch.,2002

4. Association between advance directives and quality of end-of-life care: A national study;Teno;J. Am. Geriatr. Soc.,2007

5. Inpatients’ willingness on and acceptance of promotion for signing of advance directives;Lin;TJHPC,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3