Perceptions, Attitudes, and Barriers towards the Use of Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions (CBAHI) Standards among Saudi Healthcare Providers

Author:

Kabrah Saeed M.1ORCID,Abuzerr Samer23ORCID,Flemban Arwa4ORCID,Jambi Layal5ORCID,Kabrah Ahmed1ORCID,Alghamdi Saad1ORCID,Alghamdi Saeed M.6ORCID,Alshareef Ahmad A.7ORCID,Melibary Seham M.8ORCID,Al-Ghamdi Dakheelallah Homoud9ORCID,Filfilan Najeeb O.10ORCID,Ralsan Tahani S.11ORCID,Alzhrani Adel A.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia

2. Department of Medical Sciences, University College of Science & Technology-Khan Younis, Gaza P.O. Box 8, Palestine

3. Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada

4. Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia

5. Radiological Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11433, Saudi Arabia

6. Respiratory Care Program, Clinical Technology Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia

7. Laboratory and Blood Bank, PCR Department, AlNoor Specialist Hospital, Ministry of Health Makkah, Makkah 24241, Saudi Arabia

8. Quality Department, Regional Laboratory and Blood Banks, Ministry of Health Jeddah, Jeddah 22421, Saudi Arabia

9. Health Support Services Centre, Ministry of Health Riyadh, Riyadh 12233, Saudi Arabia

10. Safety and Sterilization Department, Regional Laboratory and Blood Banks, Ministry of Health Makkah, Makkah 25215, Saudi Arabia

11. Quality Management MOH Laboratory Accreditation Supportive CBAHI/CAP, Dammam 34116, Saudi Arabia

12. Quality Department, Regional Laboratory and Blood Banks, Ministry of Health Makkah, Makkah 25215, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Background: Quality improvement is a strategic priority for all healthcare systems. However, the engagement of healthcare providers in pursuing accreditation plays a critical role in integrating standards into routine practice. Therefore, the current study assessed the perceptions, attitudes, and barriers towards using the Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions (CBAHI) standards among Saudi healthcare providers. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023 among a representative sample (364) of Saudi healthcare providers (both genders, aged 20–60) working at twenty governmental CBAHI-accredited hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The study participants were selected using a cluster random sampling method. Data regarding the perceptions, attitudes, and barriers toward using CBAHI standards among Saudi healthcare providers were evaluated using a validated questionnaire. Additional information regarding demographic–socioeconomic variables was obtained with an interview-based questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 28. Results: A total of 364 healthcare providers participated in the current study. Of them, 54.4% were males, and 45.6% were females. Almost half (48.6%) of the study participants held bachelor’s degrees. For the variables of age group, marital status, monthly income, and years of work experience, statistically significant associations were found between males and females (p-value < 0.05). The means of overall item agreement percentage of the participating healthcare providers for perceptions and attitudes towards using CBAHI standards and attitudes towards using CBAHI standards as a tool for quality improvement were 80.1%, 76.4%, and 72.0%, respectively. The highest item agreement percentage of the participating healthcare providers regarding the barriers that inhibit the hospital from obtaining the full benefit from the CBAHI accreditation was for the inexpedient IT tools (59.6%). Conclusion: The current study’s results demonstrated accepted perceptions and attitudes toward using CBAHI standards among Saudi healthcare providers. In addition, the identified barriers should be alleviated to improve the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of the hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The findings also help clarify the accreditation operating process, which may be helpful to policymakers and stakeholders in making informed decisions on integrating accreditation standards.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference37 articles.

1. Lessons learned from quality management system ISO 9001: 2015 certification: Practices and barrier identification from Brazilian industrial companies;Barbosa;Benchmarking Int. J.,2022

2. How Do Accredited Organizations Evaluate the Quality and Effectiveness of Their Human Research Protection Programs?;Taylor;AJOB Empir. Bioeth.,2023

3. Factors affecting compliance with national accreditation essential safety standards in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia;Althumairi;Sci. Rep.,2022

4. The impact of Saudi hospital accreditation on quality of care: A mixed methods study;Almasabi;Int. J. Health Plan. Manag.,2017

5. CBAHI (2023, November 02). Healthcare Accreditation Is an Assessment Process That Involves a Rigorous, Transparent, and Comprehensive Evaluation by an External Independent Accreditation Body, Available online: https://portal.cbahi.gov.sa/english/accreditation/about-accreditation.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3