Bibliometric Analysis: Six Decades of Scientific Production from a Nationwide Institution: Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado (ISSSTE) from Mexico

Author:

Pacheco Aispuro Gerónimo1ORCID,Rojas Jácome Ileana Belén12ORCID,Martínez Zamora Carlos Alejandro3ORCID,Gil-Ortiz Mejía Cuauhtémoc4,Mader Christopher5,Castillo Rangel Carlos6,Monroy Sosa Alejandro7,Flores-Vázquez Mario8,Arroyo Zavala Octavio Jesús9,Ramos-Zúñiga Rodrigo10ORCID,González Garibay Guillermo11,Ángel Alavez Gerson12,Lee Ángel12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, Hospital Ángeles del Pedregal, Mexico City 10700, Mexico

2. Mexican Faculty of Medicine, Universidad La Salle, Mexico City 06140, Mexico

3. School of Medicine, Saint Luke Escuela de Medicina, Mexico City 11000, Mexico

4. Department of Neurosurgery, Centro Médico Nacional 20 de Noviembre ISSSTE, Mexico City 03104, Mexico

5. Department of Neurosurgery, ISSSTE Hospital Regional Lic. Adolfo López Mateos, Mexico City 01030, Mexico

6. Department of Neurosurgery, ISSSTE Hospital Regional 1° de Octubre, Mexico City 07760, Mexico

7. Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital ISSSTE Tláhuac, Mexico City 13273, Mexico

8. Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Regional Dr. Valentín Gómez Farías-ISSSTE, Zapopan 45100, Mexico

9. Department of Neurosurgery, ISSSTE Hospital Regional Gral. Ignacio Zaragoza, Mexico City 09100, Mexico

10. Center of Health Sciences, University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44100, Mexico

11. Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Anáhuac México Norte, Naucalpan de Juárez 52786, Mexico

12. Hospital Ángeles del Pedregal, Mexico City 10700, Mexico

Abstract

Background: This study employed bibliometric analysis to ascertain the research focus areas among a group of Mexican physicians affiliated with the Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado (ISSSTE). ISSSTE, a healthcare institution catering to a diverse range of diseases, offers a distinctive perspective on the investigated specialties within the realm of health. The primary objective was to identify knowledge gaps in medical care disciplines through a comprehensive examination of scholarly publications. Methods: We retrieved Scopus papers affiliated with “ISSSTE” and saved them as .CSV files. Subsequently, we employed VOSviewer, biblioshiny, and bibliometrix for bibliometric analysis. This enabled us to identify prominent institutions, prolific authors, highly cited researchers, and their respective affiliations. Results: Our analysis identified 2063 publications; the specialty internal medicine accounted for the greatest proportion with 831 publications. Original papers accounted for 82% of the total, with 52% of them being written in Spanish. The majority of scientific output, 92%, originated from Mexico City. The annual production has steadily increased since 2010, peaking in 2021 with over 200 publications. However, papers on prevalent conditions, such as metabolic syndrome, received limited citations, and the L0 index (percentage of uncited items) for all papers is close to 60%. Scopus mislabeled one affiliation, and some cases show a low paper-to-author ratio of 0.5 Discussion: Additional concerns, such as honorary authorship due to excessive authors per paper, and the underlying causes of low citation rates in Mexican publications, warrant further examination. Moreover, our research emphasizes the urgency of bolstering research and development funding, which was consistently below 0.5% of GDP for the past four decades, falling short of legal mandates and international benchmarks. We endorse the establishment of robust research collectives in Latin America to address these challenges, foster regional scientific output, and transition from knowledge consumers to knowledge producers, thereby reducing dependence on foreign technology.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference55 articles.

1. Bibliometric Analysis for Medical Research;Kumar;Indian J. Psychol. Med.,2022

2. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines;Donthu;J. Bus. Res.,2021

3. The 2020 research pandemic: A bibliometric analysis of publications on COVID-19 and their scientific impact during the first months;Zenteno;Arch. Cardiol. Mex.,2021

4. Bibliometric Analysis of Mexican Publications on Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery From 1949 to 2021;Bowles;Front. Surg.,2022

5. The transformation of medical research in Mexico: A structural analysis of thematic domains, institutional affiliations, authors’ cohorts, and possible correlations;Milia;Quant. Sci. Stud.,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3