Affiliation:
1. School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
2. State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guiyang 550001, China
Abstract
Agroforestry systems (AFS) are priority semi-natural ecosystems in fragile ecological zones. The complexity and diversity of their species structure play a crucial role in maintaining AFS stability. To explore the optimization of improvement strategies in AFS’ structure and stability for control of karst desertification (KD), in this study, we chose typical desertification control areas in the southern China karst region. The study included homegarden (HG), agrisilviculture (ASV), and multipurpose woodlots (MWLs) as three AFS. We quantified the AFS’ structural characteristics using descriptive statistics and spatial structure parameters. We used the fuzzy integrated evaluation method with structural and functional indicators as guidelines, and stand structure, plant species diversity, soil fertility, and environmental factors as first-level evaluation indicators. The entropy weight method calculates the weights of indicators at all levels. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method establishes an evaluation index system to evaluate the grading of AFS’ stability. The results showed that: (i) The species composition of the AFS in the KD control areas had a simple structure, the overall diversity level was low, and the diversity level of herbaceous plants was better than that of woody plants. (ii) The overall distribution curves of diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height (TH), and crown width (CW) of woody plants in the AFS in the KD control areas were slight to the left, with a single-peaked pattern, mostly randomly and unevenly distributed in space, with a low degree of tree species isolation and relatively weak stand stability. (iii) There was variability in the stability classes of different types of AFS, overall reflecting the ranking HG > ASV > MWLs. (iv) When structural optimization was applied, corresponding measures can be taken according to farmers’ wishes for different types of AFS and their primary business purposes. The improvement of stability depends mainly on the utility of the structural optimization applied coupled with positive human interference (for example, pruning, dwarfing, and dense planting). This study provides a scientific reference for maintaining the stability of AFS and promoting service provision.
Funder
Key Project of Science and Technology Program of Guizhou Province
China Overseas Expertise Introduction Program for Discipline Innovation
Reference78 articles.
1. IPBES (2018). Assessment Report on Land Degradation and Restoration: Summary for Policymakers IPBES Secretariat, The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.
2. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystem and Human Well-Being, Island Press.
3. The role of coffee agroforestry in the conservation of tree diversity and community composition of native forests in a Biosphere Reserve;Vivian;Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.,2014
4. FAO (2017). Agroforestry for Landscape Restoration: Exploring the Potential of Agroforestry to Enhance the Sustainability and Resilience of Degraded Landscapes, Food, and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
5. Why do agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity? Evidence from habitat amount hypothesis predictions;Santos;Front. Ecol. Evolut.,2022
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献