Impact of Composition and Autoclave Sterilization on the Mechanical and Biological Properties of ECM-Mimicking Cryogels
Author:
Di Muzio Laura1, Zara Susi2ORCID, Cataldi Amelia2, Sergi Claudia3, Carriero Vito Cosimo1ORCID, Bigi Barbara1ORCID, Carradori Simone2ORCID, Tirillò Jacopo3ORCID, Petralito Stefania1, Casadei Maria Antonietta1ORCID, Paolicelli Patrizia1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Drug Chemistry and Technologies, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy 2. Department of Pharmacy, University “G. d’Annunzio” Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy 3. Department of Chemical Engineering Materials Environment, Sapienza University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy
Abstract
Cryogels represent a valid strategy as scaffolds for tissue engineering. In order to adequately support adhesion and proliferation of anchorage-dependent cells, different polymers need to be combined within the same scaffold trying to mimic the complex features of a natural extracellular matrix (ECM). For this reason, in this work, gelatin (Gel) and chondroitin sulfate (CS), both functionalized with methacrylic groups to produce CSMA and GelMA derivatives, were selected to prepare cryogel networks. Both homopolymer and heteropolymer cryogels were produced, via radical crosslinking reactions carried out at −12 °C for 2 h. All the scaffolds were characterized for their mechanical, swelling and morphological properties, before and after autoclave sterilization. Moreover, they were evaluated for their biocompatibility and ability to support the adhesion of human gingival fibroblasts and tenocytes. GelMA-based homopolymer networks better withstood the autoclave sterilization process, compared to CSMA cryogels. Indeed, GelMA cryogels showed a decrease in stiffness of approximately 30%, whereas CSMA cryogels of approximately 80%. When GelMA and CSMA were blended in the same network, an intermediate outcome was observed. However, the hybrid scaffolds showed a general worsening of the biological performance. Indeed, despite their ability to withstand autoclave sterilization with limited modification of the mechanical and morphological properties, the hybrid cryogels exhibited poor cell adhesion and high LDH leakage. Therefore, not only do network components need to be properly selected, but also their combination and ability to withstand effective sterilization process should be carefully evaluated for the development of efficient scaffolds designed for tissue engineering purposes.
Funder
MUR National Innovation Ecosystem—Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR) Italy—Vitality
Reference52 articles.
1. Micro-Scaffolds as Synthetic Cell Niches: Recent Advances and Challenges;Lemma;Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.,2022 2. Carriero, V.C., Di Muzio, L., Petralito, S., Casadei, M.A., and Paolicelli, P. (2023). Cryogel Scaffolds for Tissue-Engineering: Advances and Challenges for Effective Bone and Cartilage Regeneration. Gels, 9. 3. Nitti, P., Narayanan, A., Pellegrino, R., Villani, S., Madaghiele, M., and Demitri, C. (2023). Cell-Tissue Interaction: The Biomimetic Approach to Design Tissue Engineered Biomaterials. Bioengineering, 10. 4. Socci, M.C., Rodríguez, G., Oliva, E., Fushimi, S., Takabatake, K., Nagatsuka, H., Felice, C.J., and Rodríguez, A.P. (2023). Polymeric Materials, Advances and Applications in Tissue Engineering: A Review. Bioengineering, 10. 5. Recent Trends on Biomaterials for Tissue Regeneration Applications: Review;Farag;J. Mater. Sci.,2023
|
|