Abstract
The topic of similarity plays an essential role in developing students’ deductive reasoning. However, knowing how to teach similarity and understanding how to incorporate deductive reasoning and proof along with plane geometry remain a challenge to both school curriculum creators and teachers. This study identified the problems and characteristics regarding how similarity is treated in secondary mathematics textbooks in Hong Kong in the past half century. The content analysis method was used to analyze six secondary mathematics textbook series published in different periods. From the epistemological perspective of the textbook contents, our analysis shows the historical context and learning trajectories of how similarity was treated in school curriculum. The natural axiomatic geometry paradigm is not emphasized too much at different stages and most of the textbooks did not provide formal proofs of similarity. The intuitive idea was gradually consolidated into a formal definition of similarity. Furthermore, the way that rigorous geometric deduction can be performed from intuitive concepts and experimental geometry to the idea of proofs and formal proofs is also discussed.
Funder
The Education University of Hong Kong FLASS Dean’s Research Fund
Subject
General Mathematics,Engineering (miscellaneous),Computer Science (miscellaneous)
Reference60 articles.
1. Competing arguments for the geometry course: Why were American high school students supposed to study geometry in the 20th century?;González;Int. J. Hist. Math. Educ.,2006
2. Geometry and spatial reasoning;Clements,1992
3. MATHEMATICS EDUCATORS’ VIEWS ON THE ROLE OF MATHEMATICS LEARNING IN DEVELOPING DEDUCTIVE REASONING
4. International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Geometry in Secondary Schools (ICME-13 Monographs),2018
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献