Affiliation:
1. Department of Education Sciences, University of Genoa, 16128 Genova, Italy
2. Department of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, Norway
Abstract
Syntactic priming in dialogue occurs when exposure to a particular syntactic structure implicitly induces a speaker’s subsequent preference for the same syntactic structures in their own speech. Here, we asked whether this priming effect is boosted when individuals are primed by several different speakers as opposed to one. In an initial baseline session involving a picture description task, we assessed adult participants’ production of double object/DO (vs. prepositional/PO) dative and passive (vs. active) transitive structures. Subsequently, participants played a picture description and verification game, in turns, with six other players (confederates). During verification turns, confederates primed participants by using DO and passive utterances. Crucially, participants were primed either by a single confederate (single-speaker priming condition, SSP) or by five confederates (multi-speaker priming condition, MSP). Across conditions, the same priming stimuli were presented in the same order, leaving speaker source/variation as the only different feature. The degree to which participants were primed for the target structures compared to baseline was measured. Results indicated a robust priming effect in both conditions. Nevertheless, the increase in the target structures’ use did not differ significantly between the SSP and MSP conditions, suggesting that speaker variation did not promote stronger priming.
Funder
School of Social Sciences at the University of Genoa
Faculty of Humanities at the University of Oslo
Reference52 articles.
1. An Exploration of Social Modulation of Syntactic Priming;Balcetis;Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society,2005
2. Random Effects Structure for Confirmatory Hypothesis Testing: Keep It Maximal;Barr;Journal of Memory and Language,2013
3. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Lme4;Bates;Journal of Statistical Software,2015
4. Syntactic Persistence in Language Production;Bock;Cognitive Psychology,1986
5. Closed-Class Immanence in Sentence Production;Bock;Cognition,1989