Impact of Magnifying Loupes on the Finish Lines of Fixed Prosthesis Preparations

Author:

Nóbrega Catarina1,Manso Maria Conceição12ORCID,Herrero-Climent Mariano3ORCID,Gil Javier4ORCID,Ribeiro Paulo1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. FP-I3ID, Instituto de Investigação, Inovação e Desenvolvimento, Biomedical Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Fernando Pessoa University, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal

2. RISE (Health Research Network), Universidade Fernando Pessoa, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal

3. Porto Dental Institute, 4150-518 Porto, Portugal

4. Bioengineering Institute of Technology, International University of Catalonia, Josep Trueta s/n, 08195 Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

Background: The use of magnification appears to offer advantages in dental preparation for fixed prosthetics and is widely employed in clinical practice, although it has not yet been thoroughly documented. Therefore, the primary objective is to determine the impact of magnification on the quality of finish lines during the performance of preparations for fixed prostheses. Methods: Sixty-four natural teeth were randomized into two groups: Group O (preparation without additional magnification) and Group L (preparation with Kitus® 2.5× magnifying glasses). The teeth were prepared for full crowns, and the finish lines were evaluated under the OPMI® PicoZeiss dental microscope at 10× magnification, based on the criteria of Continuity, Roughness, and Thickness. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in any of the parameters evaluated. In Thickness, Group O had a median (IQR) of 600 µm (500; 800 µm) and Group L, 600 µm (400; 800 µm). Group L was Continuous in 64.8% of the cases, Slightly Continuous in 26.1% of the evaluations, and Not Continuous in 9.1% of the cases, thus having a slight advantage over Group O, whose values were 58.0%, 35.2%, and 6.8%, respectively. Group L was Polished in 71.0% of the cases and Rough in 29.0% of the evaluations, against 69.3% and 30.7% of Group O, respectively. These results were obtained using IBM SPSS ® software, version 29.0. Conclusions: The 2.5× magnification magnifiers demonstrated a slight positive impact on improving the quality of dental preparations for fixed prostheses. Nevertheless, since the results are not statistically significant, it is difficult to extrapolate them to the broader population.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference27 articles.

1. Future needs for fixed and removable partial dentures in the United States;Douglass;J. Prosthet. Dent.,2002

2. Preparos Dentais em Prótese Fixa: Revisão Integrativa da Literatura e Protocolo para Preparo;Cristina;Arch. Health Investig.,2022

3. Influence of Work Time Conditions on Quality of Tooth Preparation for Porcelain Fused to Metal Restoration Performed by Dental Students;Al-Andal. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci.,2020

4. Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to-metal and two types of ceramic crown;Hung;J. Prosthet. Dent.,1990

5. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. I. Implant-supported FPDs;Pjetursson;Clin. Oral Implants Res.,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3