Two Years of the COVID-19 Crisis: Anxiety, Creativity and the Everyday

Author:

Puggioni Raffaela1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Dipartimento di Scienze Politiche, Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli, 00197 Rome, Italy

Abstract

Doubtless, the COVID-19 pandemic has been extremely challenging in all aspects. However, rather than looking at COVID-19 exclusively as a catastrophic event, which has generated insecurity, anxiety, panic and helplessness, I suggest investigating this insecurity and anxiety through the prism of existential philosophy. Drawing, in particular, on the work of Søren Kierkegaard and the literature on the existentialist anxiety of international relations, this study suggested looking at anxiety not in terms of insecurity but as “freedom’s actuality”. In other words, the attention was focused not so much on the many restrictions and bans imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic, but on the many quotidian and minuscule creative interventions through which people attempted to counterbalance, respond and react to them by creating new possibilities of freedom. Special attention was devoted to the distinction between normal and neurotic anxiety. This distinction is especially important, as it connects to two different and opposing subjectivities. While normal anxiety encourages a proactive approach to life—inspiring individuals to change the present through new daily strategies—neurotic anxiety prevents it, as it tends to replicate the ordinary, the known and the familiar.

Funder

European Union’s Horizon

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference81 articles.

1. The International Health Regulations, COVID-19, and Bordering Practices: Who Gets in, What Gets out, and Who Gets Rescued?;Ferhani;Contemp. Secur. Policy,2020

2. Borders and Mobility Injustice in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic;Casaglia;J. Borderl. Stud.,2021

3. “We Closed the Ports to Protect Refugees.” Hygienic Borders and Deterrence Humanitarianism during COVID-19;Tazzioli;Int. Polit. Sociol.,2021

4. The Bound Executive: Emergency Powers during the Pandemic;Ginsburg;Int. J. Const. Law,2021

5. COVID-19: Testing the Limits of Human Rights;Spadaro;Eur. J. Risk Regul.,2020

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3