Abstract
Risk preference theory states that religiosity positively correlates with risk aversion. Based on data from the 2018 wave of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), this study tested risk preference theory in the Chinese mainland. A binary logistic regression model was used to empirically test the relationship between risk preference and religious belief. At the same time, a robustness test was carried out using the propensity score-matching method and other datasets, and multinomial logistic regression was conducted to explore the heterogeneity of the relationship between risk preference and religious belief. The results showed that risk-seeking people are more likely to have religious beliefs. The importance of the study lies in the extension of risk preference theory to consideration of religious regulations.
Reference52 articles.
1. Control Deprivation Decreases, Not Increases, Belief in a Controlling God for People with Independent Self-Construal;Alper;Current Psychology,2019
2. Recent Criticisms and Defenses of Pascal’s Wager;Anderson;International Journal for Philosophy of Religion,1995
3. Religion’s evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion;Atran;Behavioral and Brain Sciences,2004
4. Reifying Sex Difference Isn’t the Answer: Gendering Processes, Risk, and Religiosity;Cornwall;Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,2009
5. Fluidity of Faith: Predictors of Religion in a Longitudinal Sample of Chinese Adults;Francis-Tan;Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,2022
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献