COVID-19 Misinformation in Portuguese-Speaking Countries: Agreement with Content and Associated Factors

Author:

Sousa Álvaro Francisco Lopes deORCID,Schneider GuilhermeORCID,Carvalho Herica Emilia Félix deORCID,Oliveira Layze Braz de,Lima Shirley Verônica Melo AlmeidaORCID,Sousa Anderson Reis de,Araújo Telma Maria Evangelista de,Camargo Emerson Lucas SilvaORCID,Oriá Mônica Oliveira BatistaORCID,Ramos Carmen Viana,de Oliveira Rodrigo Mota,Almeida Camila Aparecida Pinheiro Landim,Jacqueline Fortes Ferreira AndrêaORCID,Teixeira Jules Ramon BritoORCID,Lua Iracema,Souza Fernanda de Oliveira,Araújo Tânia Maria deORCID,Fronteira InêsORCID,Mendes Isabel Amélia Costa

Abstract

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, a complex phenomenon called the “infodemic” has emerged, compromising coping with the pandemic. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of agreement with misinformation about COVID-19 and to identify associated factors. A web survey was carried out in Portuguese-speaking countries in two stages: 1. the identification of misinformation circulating in the included countries; 2. a multicentric online survey with residents of the included countries. The outcome of the study was agreement or disagreement with misinformation about COVID-19. Multivariate analyzes were conducted using the Poisson regression model with robust variance, a logarithmic link function, and 95% confidence intervals. The prevalence of agreement with misinformation about COVID-19 was 63.9%. The following factors increased the prevalence of this outcome: having a religious affiliation (aPR: 1.454, 95% CI: 1.393–1.517), having restrictions on leisure (aPR: 1.230, 95% CI: 1.127–1.342), practicing social isolation (aPR: 1.073, 95% CI: 1.030–1.118), not avoiding agglomeration (aPR: 1.060, 95% CI: 1.005–1.117), not seeking/receiving news from scientific sources (aPR: 1.153, 95% CI: 1.068–1.245), seeking/receiving news from three or more non-scientific sources (aPR: 1.114, 95% CI: 1.049–1.182), and giving credibility to news carried by people from social networks (aPR: 1.175, 95% CI: 1.104–1.251). There was a high prevalence of agreement with misinformation about COVID-19. The quality, similarity, uniformity, and acceptance of the contents indicate a concentration of themes that reflect “homemade”, simple, and easy methods to avoid infection by SARS-CoV-2, compromising decision-making and ability to cope with the disease.

Funder

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference45 articles.

1. Infodemic-WHO|World Health Organizationhttps://www.who.int/health-topics/infodemic#tab=tab_1

2. Infodemia: excesso de quantidade em detrimento da qualidade das informações sobre a COVID-19

3. Information Disorder: Council of Europe Reporthttps://tverezo.info/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/PREMS-162317-GBR-2018-Report-desinformation-A4-BAT.pdf

4. Advertisers Jump on Coronavirus Bandwagon: Politics, News, and Business;Mejova;arXiv,2020

5. 2019-nCoV, fake news, and racism

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3