A GIS-Based Emotion Detection Framework for Multi-Risk Analysis in Urban Settlements
-
Published:2024-01-15
Issue:1
Volume:8
Page:7
-
ISSN:2413-8851
-
Container-title:Urban Science
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Urban Science
Author:
Cardone Barbara1ORCID, Di Martino Ferdinando12ORCID, Miraglia Vittorio1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, Via Toledo 402, 80134 Napoli, Italy 2. Center for Interdepartmental Research “Alberto Calza Bini”, University of Naples Federico II, Via Toledo 402, 80134 Napoli, Italy
Abstract
The application of sentiment analysis approaches to information flows extracted from the social networks connected to particular critical periods generated by pandemic, climatic and extreme environmental phenomena allow the decision maker to detect the emotional states of citizens and to determine which areas are most at risk and require specific resilient adaptation interventions. Of particular relevance today is the need to analyze the multiple risks generated by extreme phenomena in urban settlements in order for the decision maker to identify which areas are most at risk and prepare resilient intervention plans with respect to all the phenomena analyzed. In recent years, the COVID 19 pandemic emergency has forced citizens to undergo specific restrictions to protect their health; to these were added critical issues due to the occurrence of extreme climatic or environmental phenomena. In order to monitor pandemic and climate/environmental multi-risks in urban settlements, we propose a GIS-based framework in which an emotion detection method is applied to determine the prevailing emotional categories in urban study areas during pandemic periods and in the presence of extreme climatic phenomena. The framework was tested on a study area based in the six districts of the city of Bologna (Italy) in order to detect, based on the emotions expressed on social channels, which were the most critical city neighborhoods in pandemic periods and in the presence of extreme heat wave climatic events. The results show that the proposed model can represent a valid tool to support decision makers in identifying the most critical urban areas in the presence of pandemic and climate/environmental multi-risks.
Reference18 articles.
1. Marzocchi, W., Mastellone, M.L., Di Ruocco, A., Novelli, P., Romeo, E., and Gasparini, P. (2009, September 01). European commission, Principles of Multi-risk Assessment—Interaction amongst Natural and Man-Induced Risks, Directorate-General for Research Environment Directorate. Available online: http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/22eb788f–5d0a-496a-92d4-4759b0b57fde.0001.03/DOC_2. 2. Dilley, M., Chen, R.S., Deichmann, U., Lerner-Lam, A.L., and Arnold, M. (2005). Natural Disaster Hotspots: A Global Risk Analysis, The World Bank and Columbia University. 3. Madu, C.N., and Kuei, C.H. (2017). Handbook of Disaster Risk Reduction and Management, World Sci. Press & Imperial College Press. Chapter 14. 4. A review of quantification methodologies for multi-hazard interrelationships;Tilloy;Earth-Sci. Rev.,2019 5. Scolobig, A., Komendantova, N., and Mignan, A. (2017). Mainstreaming Multi-Risk Approaches into Policy. Geosciences, 7.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|