On the Complexity of the Bipartite Polarization Problem: From Neutral to Highly Polarized Discussions

Author:

Alsinet Teresa1ORCID,Argelich Josep1ORCID,Béjar Ramón1ORCID,Martínez Santi1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Computer Engineering and Digital Design, University of Lleida, Jaume II, 69, 25001 Lleida, Spain

Abstract

The bipartite polarization problem is an optimization problem where the goal is to find the highest polarized bipartition on a weighted and labeled graph that represents a debate developed through some social network, where nodes represent user’s opinions and edges agreement or disagreement between users. This problem can be seen as a generalization of the maxcut problem, and in previous work, approximate solutions and exact solutions have been obtained for real instances obtained from Reddit discussions, showing that such real instances seem to be very easy to solve. In this paper, we further investigate the complexity of this problem by introducing an instance generation model where a single parameter controls the polarization of the instances in such a way that this correlates with the average complexity to solve those instances. The average complexity results we obtain are consistent with our hypothesis: the higher the polarization of the instance, the easier is to find the corresponding polarized bipartition. In view of the experimental results, it is computationally feasible to implement transparent mechanisms to monitor polarization on online discussions and to inform about solutions for creating healthier social media environments.

Funder

MICINN

consolidated research group

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference32 articles.

1. Neudert, L.M., and Marchal, N. (2019). Polarisation and the Use of Technology in Political Campaigns and Communication, European Parliamentary Research Service. Technical Report.

2. Valentini, D., Lorusso, A.M., and Stephan, A. (2020). Onlife Extremism: Dynamic Integration of Digital and Physical Spaces in Radicalization. Front. Psychol., 11.

3. Polarización y tecnologías de la información: Radicales vs. extremistas;Almagro;Trevista Int. éTicas Apl.,2021

4. Cf, O. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

5. A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy;Oswald;Nat. Hum. Behav.,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3