Assessing the Efficiency of Two Silvicultural Approaches for Soil Erosion Mitigation Using a Novel Monitoring Apparatus

Author:

Salvaneschi Pietro1ORCID,Pica Antonio2ORCID,Apollonio Ciro1ORCID,Andrisano Teodoro3,Pecci Massimo4,Petroselli Andrea1ORCID,Schirone Bartolomeo1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy

2. Department of Ecological and Biological Sciences (DEB), Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy

3. Maiella National Park, Via Badia 28, 67039 Sulmona, Italy

4. Department of Regional Affairs and Autonomies (DARA)—Presidency of the Council of Ministers, Via della Stamperia 8, 00186 Rome, Italy

Abstract

Soil erosion and hydrogeological risk are critical phenomena gaining increased recognition within the scientific community. Although these occurrences are naturally occurring, human activities can exacerbate their impacts. For example, deforestation consistently amplifies soil erosion. This study examines two distinct forest management strategies aimed at addressing soil erosion: the Banded Standards Method (BSM) and the Scattered Standards Method (SSM). We conducted a field experiment in two test areas located in central Italy, with one area employing the BSM and the other implementing the SSM. Two soil erosion plots were established, representing prototypes of a novel erosion monitoring apparatus called the Natural Erosion Trap (NET), or Diabrosimeter, specifically designed for forest environments. At regular intervals, particularly after significant storm events, sediment and leaf litter accumulated within the erosion plots were collected, dried, and weighed to quantify erosion rates and assess the efficacy of the silvicultural methods under investigation. The results revealed a 30.72% reduction in the eroded material with BSM compared to SSM, underscoring BSM’s ability to mitigate potential hazards and preserve environmental integrity.

Funder

Maiella National Park Authority

European Union Next-GenerationEU

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference53 articles.

1. Global Potential Soil Erosion with Reference to Land Use and Climate Changes;Yang;Hydrol. Process.,2003

2. Using the USLE: Chances, Challenges and Limitations of Soil Erosion Modelling;Alewell;Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res.,2019

3. Global-Scale Application of the RUSLE Model: A Comprehensive Review;Kumar;Hydrol. Sci. J.,2022

4. van der Knijff, J., Jones, R., and Montanarella, L. (2024, February 22). Soil Erosion Risk Assessment in Italy. Available online: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC19353.

5. FAO (2019). Soil Erosion: The Greatest Challenge for Sustainable Soil Management, FAO.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3