Propofol-Based Anesthesia Maintenance and/or Volatile Anesthetics during Intracranial Aneurysm Repair: A Comparative Analysis of Neurological Outcomes

Author:

Esmaeeli Shooka12,Motayagheni Negar3,Brenes Bastos Andres4ORCID,Ogilvy Christopher5,Thomas Ajith6,Pollard Richard1ORCID,Buhl Lauren7ORCID,Baker Maxwell2ORCID,Phan Sheshanna8ORCID,Hassan Omron9,Fehnel Corey10,Eikermann Matthias11,Shaefi Shahzad1,Nozari Ala12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA

2. Department of Anesthesiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University, Boston, MA 02118, USA

3. Heart Transplant Program, Cedars-Sinai California Heart Center, Beverly Hills, CA 90211, USA

4. Department of Anesthesiology, Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA

5. Division of Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA

6. Department of Neurosurgery, Cooper University Hospital, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ 08103, USA

7. Department of Anesthesiology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH 03766, USA

8. Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Hospital, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA

9. Department of Internal Medicine, Freeman Hospital, Joplin, MO 64804, USA

10. Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA

11. Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, Pain Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA

Abstract

Background: Volatile and intravenous anesthetics have substantial effects on physiological functions, notably influencing neurological function and susceptibility to injury. Despite the importance of the anesthetic approach, data on its relative risks or benefits during surgical clipping or endovascular treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) remains scant. We investigated whether using volatile anesthetics alone or in combination with propofol infusion yields superior neurological outcomes following UIA obliteration. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1001 patients who underwent open or endovascular treatment for UIA, of whom 596 had short- and long-term neurological outcome data (modified Rankin Scale) recorded. Multivariable ordinal regression analysis was performed to examine the association between the anesthetic approach and outcomes. Results: Of 1001 patients, 765 received volatile anesthetics alone, while 236 received propofol infusion and volatile anesthetics (combined anesthetic group). Short-term neurological outcome data were available for 619 patients and long-term data for 596. No significant correlation was found between the anesthetic approach and neurologic outcomes, irrespective of the type of procedure (open craniotomy or endovascular treatment). The combined anesthetic group had a higher rate of ICU admission (p < 0.001) and longer ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS, p < 0.001). Similarly, a subgroup analysis revealed longer ICU and hospital LOS (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001, respectively) in patients who underwent endovascular UIA obliteration under a combined anesthetic approach (n = 678). Conclusions: The addition of propofol to volatile anesthetics during UIA obliteration does not provide short- or long-term benefits to neurologic outcomes. Compared to volatile anesthetics alone, the combination of propofol and volatile anesthetics may be associated with an increased rate of ICU admission, as well as longer ICU and hospital LOS.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference33 articles.

1. Review of cerebral aneurysm formation, growth, and rupture;Chalouhi;Stroke,2013

2. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association;Benjamin;Circulation,2017

3. Mortality in the United States, 2013;Kochanek;NCHS Data Brief.,2013

4. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2013 Update: A report from the American Heart Association;Go;Circulation,2013

5. A raised bar for aneurysm surgery in the endovascular era;Kalani;J. Neurosurg.,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3