Use of Ketamine in Patients with Multifactorial Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Bruna-Mejias Alejandro1,Baeza Vicente2,Gamboa Javiera2,Baez Flores Belen2,San Martin Jessica2ORCID,Astorga Constanza3,Leyton Javiera2,Nova-Baeza Pablo2ORCID,Orellana-Donoso Mathias34,Suazo-Santibañez Alejandra5,Becerra-Farfán Alvaro6ORCID,Oyanedel-Amaro Gustavo7,Valenzuela-Fuenzalida Juan Jose2

Affiliation:

1. Departamento de Ciencias y Geografía, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas, Universidad de Playa Ancha, Valparaíso 2360072, Chile

2. Departamento de Morfología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago 8420524, Chile

3. Faculty of Medicine and Science, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago 8420524, Chile

4. Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Finis Terrae, Santiago 7501015, Chile

5. Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Universidad de las Américas, Santiago 8370040, Chile

6. Escuela de Fonoaudiología & Departamento de Ciencias Química y Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Bernardo O’Higgins, Santiago 8320000, Chile

7. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago 8910060, Chile

Abstract

Neuropathic pain (NP) is a heterogeneous group of conditions characterized by the experience of a number of sensory disturbances including pain, burning sensations, paroxysms of stabbing pain, dysesthesias, allodynia, and hyperalgesia. The above-mentioned sensations may occur in a specific dermatome area or other delimited region of the body. The objective of this review was to analyze the evidence for ketamine in multifactorial neuropathic pain. The research group systematically searched the databases MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (Cinahl), and the Web of Science. The findings of this review show that different forms of low doses of ketamine (LDK) do not present statistically significant changes for any of the scales included. In this study, the total symptom score [standardized mean difference (SMD) = −3.59, confidence interval (CI) = −4.16 to −3.02, and p < 0.00001], neuropathy impairment score (SMD = −1.42, CI = −3.68 to 0.84, and p = 0.22), and neuropathy symptom checklist (SMD = −0.09, CI = −0.15 to −0.02, and p = 0.01) were taken into account. For finality compared to the use of a placebo, the findings suggest that LDK does not exhibit significant differences in terms of pain reduction and functionality. Moreover, no specific dosages are identified to support the use of LDK in the reduction in NP.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3