Furthering Automatic Feature Extraction for Fit-for-Purpose Cadastral Updating: Cases from Peri-Urban Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
-
Published:2023-08-24
Issue:17
Volume:15
Page:4155
-
ISSN:2072-4292
-
Container-title:Remote Sensing
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Remote Sensing
Author:
Metaferia Mekonnen Tesfaye1ORCID, Bennett Rohan Mark123ORCID, Alemie Berhanu Kefale4ORCID, Koeva Mila5ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Space Science and Geospatial Institute (SSGI), Addis Ababa P.O. Box 33679/597, Ethiopia 2. School of Business, Law and Entrepreneurship, Swinburne University of Technology, John Street, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia 3. Kadaster, The Netherlands Cadastre, Land Registry and Mapping Agency, 7311 KZ Apeldoorn, The Netherlands 4. Institute of Land Administration, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar P.O. Box 79, Ethiopia 5. Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, 7514 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
Abstract
Fit-for-purpose land administration (FFPLA) seeks to simplify cadastral mapping via lowering the costs and time associated with conventional surveying methods. This approach can be applied to both the initial establishment and on-going maintenance of the system. In Ethiopia, cadastral maintenance remains an on-going challenge, especially in rapidly urbanizing peri-urban areas, where farmers’ land rights and tenure security are often jeopardized. Automatic Feature Extraction (AFE) is an emerging FFPLA approach, proposed as an alternative for mapping and updating cadastral boundaries. This study explores the role of the AFE approach for updating cadastral boundaries in the vibrant peri-urban areas of Addis Ababa. Open-source software solutions were utilized to assess the (semi-) automatic extraction of cadastral boundaries from orthophotos (segmentation), designation of “boundary” and “non-boundary” outlines (classification), and delimitation of cadastral boundaries (interactive delineation). Both qualitative and quantitative assessments of the achieved results (validation) were undertaken. A high-resolution orthophoto of the study area and a reference cadastral boundary shape file were used, respectively, for extracting the parcel boundaries and validating the interactive delineation results. Qualitative (visual) assessment verified the completed extraction of newly constructed cadastral boundaries in the study area, although non-boundary outlines such as footpaths and artifacts were also retrieved. For the buffer overlay analysis, the interactively delineated boundary lines and the reference cadastre were buffered within the spatial accuracy limits for urban and rural cadastres. As a result, the quantitative assessment delivered 52% correctness and 32% completeness for a buffer width of 0.4 m and 0.6 m, respectively, for the interactively delineated and reference boundaries. The study proposed publicly available software solutions and outlined a workflow to (semi-) automatically extract cadastral boundaries from aerial/satellite images. It further demonstrated the potentially significant role AFE could play in delivering fast, affordable, and reliable cadastral mapping. Further investigation, based on user input and expertise evaluation, could help to improve the approach and apply it to a real-world setting.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference85 articles.
1. Remote sensing for land management and planning;Woodcock;Environ. Manag.,1983 2. Koeva, M., Stöcker, C., Crommelinck, S., Ho, S., Chipofya, M., Sahib, J., Bennett, R., Zevenbergen, J., Vosselman, G., and Lemmen, C. (2020). Innovative remote sensing methodologies for Kenyan land tenure mapping. Remote Sens., 12. 3. Šafář, V., Potůčková, M., Karas, J., Tlustý, J., Štefanová, E., Jančovič, M., and Cígler Žofková, D. (2021). The Use of UAV in Cadastral Mapping of the Czech Republic. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 10. 4. Fetai, B., Oštir, K., Kosmatin Fras, M., and Lisec, A. (2019). Extraction of visible boundaries for cadastral mapping based on UAV imagery. Remote Sens., 11. 5. Nyandwi, E., Koeva, M., Kohli, D., and Bennett, R. (2019). Comparing human versus machine-driven cadastral boundary feature extraction. Remote Sens., 11.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|