YOLO Adaptive Developments in Complex Natural Environments for Tiny Object Detection
-
Published:2024-06-27
Issue:13
Volume:13
Page:2525
-
ISSN:2079-9292
-
Container-title:Electronics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Electronics
Author:
Zhong Jikun1, Cheng Qing12, Hu Xingchen1, Liu Zhong12
Affiliation:
1. Laboratory for Big Data and Decision, National University of Defense Technology, 109 Deya Road, Changsha 410003, China 2. Hunan Institute of Advanced Technology, 699 Qingshan Road, Changsha 410003, China
Abstract
Detection of tiny object in complex environments is a matter of urgency, not only because of the high real-world demand, but also the high deployment and real-time requirements. Although many current single-stage algorithms have good detection performance under low computing power requirements, there are still significant challenges such as distinguishing the background from object features and extracting small-scale target features in complex natural environments. To address this, we first created real datasets based on natural environments and improved dataset diversity using a combination of copy–paste enhancement and multiple image enhancement techniques. As for the choice of network, we chose YOLOV5s due to its nature of fewer parameters and easier deployment in the same class of models. Most improvement strategies to boost detection performance claim to improve the performance of privilege extraction and recognition. However, we prefer to consider the combination of realistic deployment feasibility and detection performance. Therefore, based on the hottest improvement methods of YOLOV5s, we try to make adaptive improvements in three aspects, namely attention mechanism, head network, and backbone network. The experimental results proved that the decoupled head and Slimneck based improvements achieved, respectively, 0.872 and 0.849, 0.538 and 0.479, 87.5% and 89.8% on the mAP0.5, mAP0.5:0.95, and Precision metrics, surpassing the results of the baseline model on these three metrics: 0.705, 0.405 and 83.6%. This result suggests that the adaptively improved model can better meet routine testing needs without significantly increasing the number of parameters. These models perform well on our custom dataset and are also effective on images that are difficult to detect by naked eye. Meanwhile, we find that YOLOV8s, which also has the decoupled head improvement, has the results of 0.743, 0.461, and 87.17% on these three metrics. It proves that under our dataset, it is possible to achieve more advanced results with lower number of model parameters just by adding decoupled head. And according to the results, we also discuss and analyze some improvements that are not adapted to our dataset, which also provides ideas for researchers in similar scenarios: in the booming development of object detection, choosing the suitable model and adapting to combine with other technologies would help to provide solutions to real-world problems.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Reference41 articles.
1. Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., and Malik, J. (2014, January 23–28). Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Columbus, OH, USA. 2. Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., and Farhadi, A. (2016, January 27–30). You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA. 3. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., and Gelly, S. (2020). An image is worth 16 × 16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv. 4. Thermal Object Detection in Difficult Weather Conditions Using YOLO;Pobar;IEEE Access,2020 5. Image-adaptive YOLO for object detection in adverse weather conditions;Liu;AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell.,2022
|
|