Applying “Two Heads Are Better Than One” Human Intelligence to Develop Self-Adaptive Algorithms for Ridesharing Recommendation Systems

Abstract

Human beings have created numerous laws, sayings and proverbs that still influence behaviors and decision-making processes of people. Some of the laws, sayings or proverbs are used by people to understand the phenomena that may take place in daily life. For example, Murphy’s law states that “Anything that can go wrong will go wrong.” Murphy’s law is helpful for project planning with analysis and the consideration of risk. Similar to Murphy’s law, the old saying “Two heads are better than one” also influences the determination of the ways for people to get jobs done effectively. Although the old saying “Two heads are better than one” has been extensively discussed in different contexts, there is a lack of studies about whether this saying is valid and can be applied in evolutionary computation. Evolutionary computation is an important optimization approach in artificial intelligence. In this paper, we attempt to study the validity of this saying in the context of evolutionary computation approach to the decision making of ridesharing systems with trust constraints. We study the validity of the saying “Two heads are better than one” by developing a series of self-adaptive evolutionary algorithms for solving the optimization problem of ridesharing systems with trust constraints based on the saying, conducting several series of experiments and comparing the effectiveness of these self-adaptive evolutionary algorithms. The new finding is that the old saying “Two heads are better than one” is valid in most cases and hence can be applied to facilitate the development of effective self-adaptive evolutionary algorithms. Our new finding paves the way for developing a better evolutionary computation approach for ridesharing recommendation systems based on sayings created by human beings or human intelligence.