Abstract
This work aims to address whether knowing what dark tourism is (or not) impacts rumination on sadness, self-hatred, hostility, psychological vulnerability, and tourist wellbeing, as well as practices and motivations for dark tourism. A quantitative approach, based on a survey of 993 respondents, reveals that women and more educated participants know more about dark tourism; people who know what dark tourism is have visited more Holocaust museums, sites of human tragedy and natural disasters, concentration camps, and prisons; show more curiosity, need to learn and understand, and need to see morbid things. A model was found showing that gender, age, know/do not know dark tourism, and motivations (curiosity, the need to learn, the need to understand, and pleasure) explained 38.1% of a dark tourism practice index. Most findings also indicate that rumination on sadness, self-hatred, hostility, and psychological vulnerability are associated with darker practices. Greater wellbeing was not found in participants who knew in advance what dark tourism was. Interestingly, participants who visit tragic human sites present higher values in hostility and tourist wellbeing than those who do not. In summary, people who visit more dark places and score higher on negative personality characteristics have higher values of tourist wellbeing.
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference73 articles.
1. A dark tourism spectrum: Towards a typology of death and macabre related tourist sites, attractions and exhibitions;Stone;Tour. Int. Interdiscip. J.,2006
2. Dark tourism revisited: a supply/demand conceptualisation
3. The Darker Side of Travel: The Theory and Practice of Dark Tourism;Sharpley,2009
4. Consumption, motivation and experience in dark tourism: a conceptual and critical analysis
5. Dark tourism and affect: framing places of death and disaster
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献