Abstract
This study examined the effect of athletes’ competition conditions, personal performance level, and attributions toward winning or losing on the relationship between observational learning (OL) and self-efficacy (SE) based on social cognitive theory and social comparison theory. Study 1 verified the validity and reliability of the Korean versions of the Functions of Observational Learning Questionnaire (FOLQ) and the SE Questionnaire. Study 2 investigated differences in the degree to which OL predicts SE in different pressure conditions and personal performance levels. The results showed that OL increased SE in high-performing athletes in high-pressure games and better predicted SE in low-performing athletes in low-pressure games. Study 3 tested the double-mediating effects of effect and OL on the effect of attributions about winning or losing on SE. The results showed that a stronger perception that the cause of winning was internal was associated with increased pride, OL, and SE.
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference47 articles.
1. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control;Bandura,1997
2. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory;Bandura,1986
3. Social cognitive theory and self-efficacy: Implications for motivation theory and practice;Stajkovic,2003
4. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales;Bandura,2006
5. The assessment and predictive generality of self-percepts of efficacy
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献